This isn’t a progression where first they slaughter lambs, then things suddenly grow and they start slaughtering their children. The two are independent of each other. If they kill their own daughter, the a-hole should be arrested, tried for murder, and given a just sentence. If they want to slaughter lambs on their own private property, so what.
Historically Christians sacrificed lambs too. Would this judge put a stop to that as well?
Uh, no. Animal sacdifice is not part of the Christian faith.
The very first Christians did, but I am not aware of that practice carrying forward to the Gentile Christians.
I think the problem isn’t slaughtering one lamb on one’s private property (altho that may be illegal, I don’t know). I think the issue here is that slaughtering mass numbers of animals, especially since they bleed them to death, is unsanitary at the facility as it currently is. Now, I have no idea if this is correct or not, but it seems to me that many people arguing here are not arguing the actual points which would be: Is it unsanitary as it is done now and is it the government’s business to regulate these things.
susie
“Christians sacrificed lambs too.”
Ahhhhhhhh No
Jesus Christ is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world...
He was the ultimate Sacrificial Lamb for the Christians...
Christians don’t sacrifice lambs or other animals...