Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chip-Shrinking May Be Nearing Its Limits
Excite news ^ | 15 December 2007 | JORDAN ROBERTSON

Posted on 12/15/2007 7:18:06 PM PST by ShadowAce

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) - Sixty years after transistors were invented and nearly five decades since they were first integrated into silicon chips, the tiny on-off switches dubbed the "nerve cells" of the information age are starting to show their age.

The devices - whose miniaturization over time set in motion the race for faster, smaller and cheaper electronics - have been shrunk so much that the day is approaching when it will be physically impossible to make them even tinier.

Once chip makers can't squeeze any more into the same-sized slice of silicon, the dramatic performance gains and cost reductions in computing over the years could suddenly slow. And the engine that's driven the digital revolution - and modern economy - could grind to a halt.

Even Gordon Moore, the Intel Corp. (INTC) co-founder who famously predicted in 1965 that the number of transistors on a chip should double every two years, sees that the end is fast approaching - an outcome the chip industry is scrambling to avoid.

"I can see (it lasting) another decade or so," he said of the axiom now known as Moore's Law. "Beyond that, things look tough. But that's been the case many times in the past."

Preparing for the day they can't add more transistors, chip companies are pouring billions of dollars into plotting new ways to use the existing transistors, instructing them to behave in different and more powerful ways.

Intel, the world's largest semiconductor company, predicts that a number of "highly speculative" alternative technologies, such as quantum computing, optical switches and other methods, will be needed to continue Moore's Law beyond 2020.

"Things are changing much faster now, in this current period, than they did for many decades," said Intel Chief Technology Officer Justin Rattner. "The pace of change is accelerating because we're approaching a number of different physical limits at the same time. We're really working overtime to make sure we can continue to follow Moore's Law."

Transistors work something like light switches, flipping on and off inside a chip to generate the ones and zeros that store and process information inside a computer.

(AP) Nobel laureates John Bardeen, left, Walter Brattain, center, and William Shockley, right, pose...
Full Image
The transistor was invented by scientists William Shockley, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain to amplify voices in telephones for a Bell Labs project, an effort for which they later shared the Nobel Prize in physics.

On Dec. 16, 1947, Bardeen and Brattain created the first transistor. The next month, on Jan. 23, 1948, Shockley, a member of the same research group, invented another type, which went on to become the preferred transistor because it was easier to manufacture.

Transistors' ever-decreasing size and low power consumption made them an ideal candidate to replace the bulky vacuum tubes then used to amplify electrical signals and switch electrical currents. AT&T saw them as a replacement for clattering telephone switches.

Transistors eventually found their way into portable radios and other electronic devices, and are most prominently used today as the building blocks of integrated circuits, another Nobel Prize-winning invention that is the foundation of microprocessors, memory chips and other kinds of semiconductor devices.

Since the invention of the integrated circuit in the late 1950s - separately by Texas Instruments Inc. (TXN)'s Jack Kilby and future Intel co-founder Robert Noyce - the pace of innovation has been scorching.

(AP) Intel Corp. Chief Executive Paul Otellini shows off a wafer of new chips with billions of...
Full Image
The number of transistors on microprocessors - the brains of computers - has leaped from just several thousand in the 1970s to nearly a billion today, a staggering feat that has unleashed previously unimagined computing power.

"I think (the transistor) is going to be around for a long time," Moore said. "There have been ideas about how people are going to replace it, and it's always dangerous to predict something won't happen, but I don't see anything coming along that would really replace the transistor."

But there have been considerable stumbling blocks in recent years.

One problem has been trying to prevent too much heat from escaping from thinner-and-thinner components. That has led chip companies to look for new materials and other ways to improve performance.

Earlier this year, Intel and IBM Corp. separately announced that they discovered a way to boost transistor efficiency.

The solution involves replacing the silicon dioxide used for more than 40 years as an insulator, but has since been shaved too thin, with various metals in parts called the gate, which turns the transistor on and off, and the gate dielectric, an insulating layer, which helps improve transistor performance and retain energy.

Still more novel ways to prevent electricity leakage - and other problems - are being pursued. And nobody has won a bet against maintaining the pace of innovation in technology.

"The only thing that's been predicted more frequently than Moore's Law has been its demise - everybody's been wrong," said Sun Microsystems Inc. (JAVA) Chief Technology Officer Greg Papadopoulos. "It's a pretty robust set of observations and really it's about techno-economics ... It's a dangerous thing to bet against because of the economic investment cycle that's in there."


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: intel; mooreslaw; transistor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2007 7:18:08 PM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
to my thread!!!
2 posted on 12/15/2007 7:19:18 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I’ve been expecting this. The next leap will be quantum computing, but it’s still quite a few years down the road before it is used in practical applications.


3 posted on 12/15/2007 7:23:57 PM PST by tlj18 (Huckacide - the new kamikaze weapon. Defuse it while you have a chance!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Once chip makers can't squeeze any more into the same-sized slice of silicon, the dramatic performance gains and cost reductions in computing over the years could suddenly slow. And the engine that's driven the digital revolution - and modern economy - could grind to a halt.

*sigh* Or not.

Master Jordan needs to take a breath.

4 posted on 12/15/2007 7:24:13 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Yeah, I hear we’re gonna run out of oil and food, too.


5 posted on 12/15/2007 7:27:14 PM PST by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

“The transistor was invented by scientists William Shockley, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain to amplify voices in telephones for a Bell Labs project, an effort for which they later shared the Nobel Prize in physics.”

Back when the Nobel Prize meant something. Today the libs have taken it over and use it as a political tool.


6 posted on 12/15/2007 7:29:00 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlj18
"The only thing that's been predicted more frequently than Moore's Law has been its demise - everybody's been wrong,"

That is true. Don't write the transistor off so easily.

7 posted on 12/15/2007 7:29:09 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

My thoughts exactly. They may not make them smaller, but they will make them more efficient and more powerful with multiple processors, better memory, elimination of the hard drive, etc.


8 posted on 12/15/2007 7:30:42 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

500th thread!!!

Congrats!

How much lower than submicron can they go or have they?

I remember when core memory and magnetic tapes ruled, what an invention. boy, did things change since then. ;-)


9 posted on 12/15/2007 7:32:13 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

I don’t know, the transistors have been getting pretty small - like less than 100 atoms thick. It’s those pesky laws of physics. Plus, it has to be affordable, too. There’s reasons why people don’t own supercomputers.


10 posted on 12/15/2007 7:33:58 PM PST by tlj18 (Huckacide - the new kamikaze weapon. Defuse it while you have a chance!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

I remember this being said about the Vacuum tube, the transistor and the first microchips.


11 posted on 12/15/2007 7:35:32 PM PST by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

And Microsoft keeps making software bigger and slower.


12 posted on 12/15/2007 7:36:11 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Happy Birthday little buddy!


13 posted on 12/15/2007 7:36:20 PM PST by OCC (Everywhere is within walking distance if you have the time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

My guess is that optical processors (or elctro-optical) will be next. TRW started toying with the idea in the early eventies and IBM is currently working in that direction.


14 posted on 12/15/2007 7:37:36 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Moore himself says that he expects the doubling to occur for another 10 years. Exponentially, that’s frigging huge!

(Besides, it seems like every year someone espouses this "end is near" stuff.)

15 posted on 12/15/2007 7:37:39 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

eventies = seventies


16 posted on 12/15/2007 7:38:40 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Started with Tubes,,they had their day,,transistors will have theirs’,,magnetics is next,,


17 posted on 12/15/2007 7:39:25 PM PST by silentreignofheroes (I'm Southron,,,and I Vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlj18

10 years from now someone will refresh this thread and we’ll all have a good laugh


18 posted on 12/15/2007 7:43:20 PM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

I remember the eventies! Those were the days.


19 posted on 12/15/2007 7:44:22 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

You may have invented a new seperation of decades. LOL


20 posted on 12/15/2007 7:44:47 PM PST by TOneocon (The reason there is so much poverty is because of the uneven distribution of capitalism...Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson