Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should The Public Be Able To Get The Types Of Guns We Use In Iraq?
Brady Campaign ^ | December 14, 2007 | Paul Helmke

Posted on 12/14/2007 5:07:40 PM PST by holymoly

I asked this question last week of the candidates for President now campaigning in Iowa, and I think that for most of the American people [pdf] the answer is clearly “no.”

In the last ten days, two states in the heart of the country have sustained mass shootings by people armed with military-style assault rifles – two attacks with assault weapons in less than a week. One shooter attacked a mall full of employees and Christmas shoppers in Omaha. The other attacked a church in Colorado.

Together, they left twelve people dead.

Yet today assault weapons remain perfectly legal to buy in gun stores and gun shows across the country, in unlimited quantities. Perhaps even more shocking, the type of bullet many assault weapons fire (7.62mm full metal jacket) can penetrate four categories of police body armor [pdf]. There is no legitimate reason the public should have this kind of access to military-style assault weapons.

It’s also frustrating that when a UPS employee raised concerns on September 13 about the “multiple boxes” of ammunition the Colorado shooter had delivered to his postal box, police officers said there was nothing illegal. No limits on the number of guns; no limits on ammunition; very minimal limits on the type of guns – no wonder we have problems.

Since the terrible shootings last week, leading newspapers are joining the call. Here is a sample of what they’re saying.

The New York Times: “Until recently, the nation did have a law designed to protect the public from assault rifles and other high-tech infantry weapons. In 1994, enough politicians felt the public’s fear to respond with a 10-year ban on assault-weapons that was not perfect but dented the free-marketeering of Rambo mayhem. Most Americans rejected the gun lobby’s absurd claim that assault rifles are “sporting” weapons. But when it came up for renewal in 2004, President Bush and Congress caved to the gun lobby and allowed the law to lapse.”

The Philadelphia Inquirer: “The troubled 19-year-old in Omaha used his stepfather’s AK-47-type assault weapon to unleash 30 rounds of gunfire on innocent victims, and then killed himself. Who needs a gun like that around the house?”

The Washington Post: “The AK-47 assault rifle that an Omaha teenager pilfered from his stepfather was among the guns outlawed under the ban on assault weapons that Congress and President Bush unwisely allowed to lapse. Why that kind of gun should be so easily available to someone as troubled as that 19-year-old is unfathomable. Eight people shopping or working at a mall died as a result.”

To protect ourselves and our police [pdf], these weapons of war should be kept out of the hands of civilians.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; bradybunch; bradycampaign; bradywatch; hci; helmke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: StnCldTruth

And, parked in your driveway, it would keep the neighbors quiet! ;-)


41 posted on 12/14/2007 5:41:17 PM PST by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
"Should The Public Be Able To Get The Types Of Guns We Use In Iraq? "

Hell yes! That would be nice. But unfortunately we can't, so the question is a dishonest one meant to take advantage of public stupidity and the stupidity of some presidential candidates (whose answer to the question is a good indication of what they know about anything at all.

In Sweden(?) everyone has a Military automatic "assault" weapon in their closet issued them by the government. Yet you don't see anyone getting shot up with them. Proof that guns don't kill people, criminals kill people, and the criminals in that country aren't issued that military assault rifle.

The guns used in these latest shootings were not "military assault rifles", so again the author is dishonest and misleading his readers. He again misleads his readership by suggesting these special "military assault rifles" shoot special bullets that are available to the public which can penetrate bullet proof vests. Again, if this dishonest person had any intention of being truthful he would have researched this at least a wee little bit, and found out that the bullets used by the Millitary are full metal jacketed bullets in accordance with UN rules of war. The reasoning behind this is so the bullet causes less damage to internal organs because it does not expand, "mushroom" like a regular hunting bullet, therefore increasing the chances the enemy combatant will survive being shot. He will be out of action, hurt, perhaps (hopefully) be sidelined for the duration of the conflict, but live on to tell stories about it.
These bullets are not available to the public.

42 posted on 12/14/2007 5:41:50 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Yep, good post #1. You should see the looks I get from leftists and other hoplophobes when I explain that an assault rifle is not a “high power” rifle. It is better described as a “mid power” rifle designed more for close quarter battle.

jw


43 posted on 12/14/2007 5:41:53 PM PST by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bedford Forrest

Don’t look like he need a Viagra, huh?


44 posted on 12/14/2007 5:43:20 PM PST by Nova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Hemke willfully ignores history. When those types of guns were fully legal to own, we had lower crime rates than after they were made hard to own.

We had lower crime rates when you could order anti tank weapons, anti aircraft weapons, and ammunition through the mail, than you had after the 1968 gun law preventing most citizens from obtaining them easily was passed.

45 posted on 12/14/2007 5:43:57 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Yeah, what you said about so-called "assault rifles".

The Brady bunch lies, and because of the complicity and ignorance of the drive-by media, they get away with it.

46 posted on 12/14/2007 5:45:15 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Should The Public Be Able To Get The Types Of Guns We Use In Iraq?

Yes, according to the framers of the Constitution, the citizenry needs enough fire power to make the government afraid of screwing them over.
47 posted on 12/14/2007 5:49:11 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
You have my nomination for the most informative homepage of any current or past FReeper.........Nice job!

I’ve bookkmarked it for future references...........

That's quite a compliment. Thanks.

Now, if I could only get the MSM to visit it, and educate themselves... Lol.

48 posted on 12/14/2007 5:50:22 PM PST by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
LoL! That Gofer gun would be the envy of the neighborhood. I have a good clear view of the field behind my house, about one mile of gofer infested meadowland. That would be great for those long shots. :o)

I've shot hundreds of those things over the past 15 years, but they just keep popping up. They must have a direct tunnel from China or somewhere.

49 posted on 12/14/2007 5:50:45 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Yes!

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

50 posted on 12/14/2007 5:57:01 PM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
These bullets are not available to the public.

Full Metal Jacket? Ball? Military issue?

Unless they've changed the law just recently, you can buy as much as you want. Check Cheaperthandirt.com, look up SS109 5.56mm ammo. Look up 7.62mm NATO.

If you care enough to send the best, you can buy .50 cal. BMG armor-piercing incendiary rounds. They're quite festive, but don't tell the Brady bunch.

51 posted on 12/14/2007 6:04:22 PM PST by Max in Utah (If your neighbors habitually trespassed, wouldn't you want a nice tall fence with razor wire on top?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
"Moles in the backyard, that's why..."

In his final years my father would kill squirrels with a pellet gun from the window of his retirement asylum.

The rifle made no noise, but blew the little rodents to pieces.

My Lord, how the blue-haired ladies hated him for it.

I can hear him laughing still...

52 posted on 12/14/2007 6:04:41 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

53 posted on 12/14/2007 6:09:49 PM PST by Bobalu (I guess I done see'd that varmint for the last time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Mk-19: belt-fed, automatic, 40mm grenade launcher. 40 rounds per minute sustained fire. Ooh-rah!


54 posted on 12/14/2007 6:11:09 PM PST by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I don’t care what kind of weapon is employed, it won’t kill anybody deader than my shotgun will. Or, for that matter, my knife.


55 posted on 12/14/2007 6:12:50 PM PST by KarinG1 (Opinions expressed in this post are my own and do not necessarily represent those of sane people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

A few years ago, a civilian employee killed a half dozen people and wounded several more with a six (6) shot Colt snub nose revolver. Nuts to these anti-gun maggots. Arm the entire populace. No entry to public venues nor access to air travel unless you are armed. End of lunatic masacres.


56 posted on 12/14/2007 6:14:17 PM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
FREEPERS BELIEVE IT OR NOT

There was a time that democrats weren't all totally rabid about gun ownership.
In fact, many of them held beliefs and exhibited behavior that seems almost sane compared to the gang of idiotic socialist gun weenies passing for democrats today.

Hubert Humphrey former Senator, Vice President and 1968 Democrat presidential nominee:

"Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used, and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced.
But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, and one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible."

(from "Know Your Lawmakers", Guns Magazine, Page 4, Feb. 1960)

Sigmund Freud, a perennial democrat favorite because of his views on open sexuality, had this to say about the kind of gun weenies that surround us today.:

"A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."

("General Introduction to Psychoanalysis," S. Freud)

57 posted on 12/14/2007 6:16:36 PM PST by Iron Munro ( (Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
Mk-19

Those things still cooking off grenades during sustained full-auto fire?

That'll just ruin a day at the range...

58 posted on 12/14/2007 6:18:17 PM PST by Max in Utah (If your neighbors habitually trespassed, wouldn't you want a nice tall fence with razor wire on top?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Ron Paul says yes


59 posted on 12/14/2007 6:19:38 PM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Yes, especially along the U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada as well as along both ocean coasts!


60 posted on 12/14/2007 6:19:46 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson