Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe 6-pack
I have been around a couple of B 17s in my youth, as well as a Lancaster bomber.

The utilitarian fuctionalism and rugged design of the equipment is something we do not see often in military equipment these days. Everything about a B-17 was overdesigned. They were rugged.

A turret like that on a osprey with twin 50 cals would be awesome. Or even twin miniguns.

Two Ospreys could generate enough suppressive fire to land troops in the middle of a firefight if necessary, or land in the middle of a fire fight to extract troops.

I hope they go with it.

25 posted on 12/12/2007 8:04:02 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Candor7
"The utilitarian fuctionalism and rugged design of the equipment is something we do not see often in military equipment these days."

You know, I have an M42 paratrooper's top...it's as functional and every bit as rugged as anything I was issued 50 years later (although I think the Gore-Tex ECWCs will also go down as a military classic). I also think the M1 carbine is extremely under-rated for what it represented in the way of weapon design...

26 posted on 12/12/2007 8:10:59 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson