Skip to comments.
Fred Wins, Iowa Loses [Why Carolyn Washburn should keep her day job]
The Weekly Standard ^
| Dec. 12, 2007
| by Dean Barnett
Posted on 12/12/2007 6:09:32 PM PST by jdm
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
1
posted on
12/12/2007 6:09:37 PM PST
by
jdm
To: Politicalmom; Petronski; SE Mom
2
posted on
12/12/2007 6:10:42 PM PST
by
jdm
To: jdm
Clearly she’s a liberal hack (I’m being extraordinarily kind here) with an agenda to push and an axe to grind.
To: jdm
She is moderating the Dem debate, watch her play nice with them.
4
posted on
12/12/2007 6:15:46 PM PST
by
TornadoAlley3
( An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping that it will eat him last..)
To: jdm; Windcatcher; Politicalmom; All
The Des Moines Register is to the left of Pravda! Why in the world would the GOP let them and PUBLIC TELEVISION sponsor a debate?! International ANSWER and Daily Kos would probably be more fair and balanced!
5
posted on
12/12/2007 6:16:45 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: jdm
THE WINNER was Fred Thompson. Fred came to play. He also had the obvious moment of the day when he took on the officious moderator, refusing to go along with one of those idiotic "raise your hands" questions. Given the hour that the debate took place, a lot of people will probably see only a highlight package of the debate. The unquestioned highlight was Fred slapping down the moderator. Even putting that aside, Fred had his best day of the campaign. He was serious, thoughtful, and authoritative. It was a wonderful day for him. THE SILVER MEDALIST was Mitt Romney. Romney continued his fine run. Actually, the overly dry format played to his advantage. His wonkiness shines through on virtually every issue, and because there was no interplay, this debate was all about the wonkiness. His answer on education nearly broke the Luntz-o-meter
Glad to hear the grownups did well, and also glad to hear that the biggest losers and worst players in all these debates - Chris Matthews, CNN, and this - have been the liberal MSM 'moderators'. A pox on 'em.
6
posted on
12/12/2007 6:17:16 PM PST
by
WOSG
(Pro-life, pro-family, pro-freedom, pro-strong defense, pro-GWOT, pro-capitalism)
To: jdm
Fred did great in his shut down of the liberal climate/global warming question! Too bad he wasn’t allowed a minute to give an answer! The following is what Fred said on this subject back when he was sitting in for Paul Harvey. It would have been a GREAT one minute answer! :)
This is what Fred said when he was sitting in for Paul Harvey some time ago. :)
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NTQzYWY1MGM5NTkyZTM2YWVlMDMzMDlhMzQwNThhNDU=
To: jdm
For what it's worth, Washburn brought all the charm to her assignment of a latter-day Nurse Ratched. I really like Barnett, aka Chowda, but that really is Rush's line. He uses it all the time about HillRodham.
8
posted on
12/12/2007 6:19:04 PM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(No handshows - Fred Dalton Thompson for President 2008)
To: jdm
Oh come on, she was wearing a rad Mao jacket!
Probably had a copy of a certain little red book in her bag.
9
posted on
12/12/2007 6:19:16 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(Peace is not an option)
To: jdm
But if the local media are going to hijack the process and ruin it, as Carolyn Washburn surely ruined today's debate, then the parties are going to have to rethink parts of the process, if not the entire thing. Problem is, it's not LOCAL media, it's the Media as a whole. They have literally announced their allegiance to a political party, and are now nothing more than activists.
Between paid plants, inept moderators, and transparent shills, the Left feels they have reached critical mass and will do what they will, without fear of reprisal from America.
10
posted on
12/12/2007 6:19:48 PM PST
by
Old Sarge
(This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
To: seekthetruth
To: jdm
This author has a clue, and is not politically tone deaf (unlike some of the other journalists who have commented on this debate.)
12
posted on
12/12/2007 6:21:23 PM PST
by
sourcery
(If Hillary is the next President, she may also be the last.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not the best forum, but Fred made it work anyway.
13
posted on
12/12/2007 6:23:03 PM PST
by
The Pack Knight
(Duty, Honor, Country.... Valor.)
To: jdm
To: Anti-Bubba182
"Fred broke his foot off." Huh? I'm not familiar with that term...
15
posted on
12/12/2007 6:24:50 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I believe he meant to say that Fred broke his foot off somewhere in the vicinity of Washburn’s 4th point of contact.
16
posted on
12/12/2007 6:27:01 PM PST
by
The Pack Knight
(Duty, Honor, Country.... Valor.)
To: Windcatcher
The funny thing is she is tooooooo stupid to understand that Fred Thompson made her look even more moronic than she is. She is probably gloating right this very instant “boy, I sure showed him.”
Gawd help the imbecilic media .... they are slowly destroying themselves. can you say implosion?
To: The Pack Knight
As in: “Fred done broke his foot off’n her ___? Okay, I agree with that 200%!
18
posted on
12/12/2007 6:30:08 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
To: jdm; seekthetruth; prairiebreeze
A horse is a horse, of course, of course
And no one can talk to a horse, of course
That is, of course, unless the horse is the famous Mr. FRed
Go right to the source and ask the horse
He'll give you the answer that you'll endorse
He's always on a steady course
That's our Mr. FRed
People yakkity yak a streak and waste your time of day
But Mr. FRed will seldom speak unless he has something to say
A horse is a horse, of course, of course
And this one'll talk 'til his drawl is hoarse
You never heard of a talking horse?
Well, listen to him, he's our "Mr. FRed!
Leni
19
posted on
12/12/2007 6:30:19 PM PST
by
MinuteGal
(Three Cheers for the FRed, White and Blue !!!)
To: jdm
Fred did fantastic, but could have added on the scam question, “If you think Global Warming is important enough to rate a question, why is it not important enough for comment?”
He implied that though, good enough.
It’s too bad that people think he is “tired” because he has wrinkles and doesn’t talk fast like Yankees do. In doing business with a lot of slow-talking Southerners I have learned not to underestimate them. Some of them are most dangerous when they sound like they are about to fall asleep.
20
posted on
12/12/2007 6:31:51 PM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(Fred Thompson's Federalism is right on.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson