Good job Fred!
1 posted on
12/12/2007 2:30:12 PM PST by
JRochelle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: JRochelle
Frank Luntz took a moment on Fox to point out this exchange as that moment that we all remember. It was very popular with his focus group, and he added that some in the group applauded even though they werent live in Iowa.
Its going to resonate.
2 posted on
12/12/2007 2:31:40 PM PST by
Petronski
(Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
To: JRochelle
...almost entirely neglected foreign policy....Good. Gad.
3 posted on
12/12/2007 2:31:51 PM PST by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: JRochelle
Well, I’m not so sure it was as bold as Keyes demanding not to be skipped, but what the hay.
4 posted on
12/12/2007 2:31:57 PM PST by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: JRochelle
Thompson came off with three to five hilarious one-liners sure to have won anyone but Tancredo, Hunter and himself the debate, if spin werent king.
5 posted on
12/12/2007 2:32:14 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: jellybean; Politicalmom; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; ...
6 posted on
12/12/2007 2:32:28 PM PST by
Politicalmom
(Huckabee is the GOP's Jimmy Carter. Are you ready for the plundering of your pocketbook?)
To: JRochelle
when he refused to raise his hand at the behest of the moderator What does this mean? why did the moderator ask him to raise his hand?
To: JRochelle
Anyone who says he is lacksadaisical or boring to the point of sleep needs to see how he handled himself today. I watched as a few other candidates began to raise their hands until Fred said he would not raise his hand. The others then applauded and acted like ..yeah what he said.
Fred was great today.
10 posted on
12/12/2007 2:33:56 PM PST by
donnab
(saving liberal brains...one moron at a time.)
To: JRochelle
CONGRATS!!! BOB DOLE!!!!!!!
14 posted on
12/12/2007 2:35:17 PM PST by
GoMonster
(GO)
To: JRochelle
15 posted on
12/12/2007 2:35:31 PM PST by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
To: JRochelle
Now, Fred needs to work his ass off in Iowa the next couple of weeks and move ahead of Romney there. If he can get into second-place, he can win South Carolina and can win the nomination.
20 posted on
12/12/2007 2:36:47 PM PST by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: JRochelle
In short, today Thompson was everything that conservatives had hoped they'd be getting when he announced his candidacy.Hallelujah Chorus
21 posted on
12/12/2007 2:37:25 PM PST by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: JRochelle
I didn’t see the debate and the article sure didn’t tell me much. “Refused to raise his hand”? What happened, briefly?
24 posted on
12/12/2007 2:37:49 PM PST by
truthkeeper
(It's the borders, stupid.)
To: JRochelle
With that said, Fred Thompson was the only candidate who stood out. He was funny, charming, and peppy. Here was a guy who wasn't afraid to speak hard truths, and who displayed knowledge of the policy issues--especially on entitlements. But the moment of the debate, the moment that will be talked about should he defy expectations and go on to win the nomination, was when he refused to raise his hand at the behest of the moderator. This demonstrated conviction, showed he was able to stand up for his principles, that he was a man who valued substance, a leader rather than a follower, and somebody who is running a different kind of campaign. In short, today Thompson was everything that conservatives had hoped they'd be getting when he announced his candidacy.
I'm not sure how many people noticed in the moment, but I did. Every other candidate said, "Yeah me neither."
Incredibly, the other candidates had instantly placed the mantle of leadership on Thompson without thinking.
Ooops.
25 posted on
12/12/2007 2:38:08 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
To: JRochelle
Thats a big FRED THOMPSON (true Conservative Federalist) - NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERIENCE (I’ll do whatever it takes to stop the bastards, include water-boarding) - 2ND AMENDMENT ADVOCATE (arm everyone and the criminals will back off) - SECURE THE BORDERS (starve the bastards out and they will go home) - LAW AND ORDER (enforcement first and foremost) - SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM (the program can’t sustain itself) - DEFEAT THE DEMOCRAT (any fool they put up) TAX SIMPLIFICATION (choice for the tax payer) - PING!
It’s about time a LEADER like FRED said “enough is enough” of this foolishness. FRED led...the others followed! Huckelberry is still a fool...this debate hasn’t changed my mind on that.
33 posted on
12/12/2007 2:41:40 PM PST by
Bobbisox
(ALL AMERICAN GRANDMA FREEPER FredHEAD! The Hunt for a FRED November is on! Don't be fooled!)
To: JRochelle
was when he refused to raise his hand at the behest of the moderator”
elaborate?
To: JRochelle
Fred also did a great job in his interview with Sean today. He had only 13 minutes, but he packed a great deal into it and was positive and upbeat! GO FRED!
To: JRochelle
I have predicted and will again predict that Fred will make his big showing in South Carolina and will eventually get the nomination.
Fred is the only candidate besides Hunter that represents all of what a conservative could want in a candidate.
Go Fred.
My Check is in the mail, honest.
39 posted on
12/12/2007 2:44:51 PM PST by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
To: JRochelle
Fred and Mitt, what a great GOP team that will be. (Although not necessarily in that order).
To: JRochelle
![](http://www.davidemaggio.it/images/georgepeppard.jpg)
I love it when a plan comes together...
45 posted on
12/12/2007 2:49:11 PM PST by
ejonesie22
(In America all people have a right to be wrong, some just exercise it a bit much...)
To: JRochelle
Didn’t see the debate, but saw the highlights afterward on Fox. They absolutely skewered the reporterette in charge of the questions. The highlight seemed to be Fred Thompson’s refusal to take her order for a show of hands on man-made global warming. Good for him!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson