Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fred Thompson Wins, Hands Down (Freds' "I paid for this microphone" moment)
American Spectator ^ | 12/12/2007 | Philip Kline

Posted on 12/12/2007 2:30:09 PM PST by JRochelle

First, let me say that this was by far the worst debate yet. The questions were not only skewed to the left, not only almost entirely neglected foreign policy, but they were so broad as to allow the candidates to fall back on talking points. Also, there was no room for back and forth between the candidates. Absolutely awful.

With that said, Fred Thompson was the only candidate who stood out. He was funny, charming, and peppy. Here was a guy who wasn't afraid to speak hard truths, and who displayed knowledge of the policy issues--especially on entitlements. But the moment of the debate, the moment that will be talked about should he defy expectations and go on to win the nomination, was when he refused to raise his hand at the behest of the moderator. This demonstrated conviction, showed he was able to stand up for his principles, that he was a man who valued substance, a leader rather than a follower, and somebody who is running a different kind of campaign. In short, today Thompson was everything that conservatives had hoped they'd be getting when he announced his candidacy.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 2008; election; elections; fred; fredthompson; gopdebates; ia2008; noraiseasteenkinhand; statesman; tas; winners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-340 next last
To: JRochelle
In short, today Thompson was everything that conservatives had hoped they'd be getting when he announced his candidacy.

Hallelujah Chorus

21 posted on 12/12/2007 2:37:25 PM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

You’re very confused.


22 posted on 12/12/2007 2:37:37 PM PST by Petronski (Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Windbag, but still, you invite him, you can’t skip over him like that.


23 posted on 12/12/2007 2:37:44 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I didn’t see the debate and the article sure didn’t tell me much. “Refused to raise his hand”? What happened, briefly?


24 posted on 12/12/2007 2:37:49 PM PST by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
With that said, Fred Thompson was the only candidate who stood out. He was funny, charming, and peppy. Here was a guy who wasn't afraid to speak hard truths, and who displayed knowledge of the policy issues--especially on entitlements. But the moment of the debate, the moment that will be talked about should he defy expectations and go on to win the nomination, was when he refused to raise his hand at the behest of the moderator. This demonstrated conviction, showed he was able to stand up for his principles, that he was a man who valued substance, a leader rather than a follower, and somebody who is running a different kind of campaign. In short, today Thompson was everything that conservatives had hoped they'd be getting when he announced his candidacy.

I'm not sure how many people noticed in the moment, but I did.  Every other candidate said, "Yeah me neither."

Incredibly, the other candidates had instantly placed the mantle of leadership on Thompson without thinking.

Ooops.

25 posted on 12/12/2007 2:38:08 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I win. :p


26 posted on 12/12/2007 2:38:52 PM PST by Politicalmom (Huckabee is the GOP's Jimmy Carter. Are you ready for the plundering of your pocketbook?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

That was Fred’s brilliant moment, slapping down that moderator in her nefarious attempt to pigeon-hole them into a black/white position on an extradordinarily complex issue. “I’m not doing a show of hands. You’re not going to give me 60 seconds, I’m not going to answer it.” It was as though he were responding in-kind to a petulant five-year old.


27 posted on 12/12/2007 2:39:22 PM PST by Lexinom (Build the fence and call China to account. GoHunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

Paraphrased. The mod said, “I would like to see a show of hands... (on a topic)” Thompson said he wouldn’t be playing that game this time around, and every said, me neither.


28 posted on 12/12/2007 2:39:30 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Aria; Brad from Tennessee

Thanks for ‘splaining. I was kind of lost.


29 posted on 12/12/2007 2:40:08 PM PST by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

Fred’s the one!


30 posted on 12/12/2007 2:41:00 PM PST by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

The mod shook that off and said, “Okay, well then do you support... yes or no?” Thompson asked, “Do I get one minute to respond.” She said no. He said, “Then I won’t be responding.”


31 posted on 12/12/2007 2:41:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I’m not sure how many people noticed in the moment, but I did. Every other candidate said, “Yeah me neither.”

I noticed...it was a very telling moment. They even all looked to him. Fred owned it.


32 posted on 12/12/2007 2:41:36 PM PST by donnab (saving liberal brains...one moron at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

That’s a big FRED THOMPSON (true Conservative Federalist) - NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERIENCE (I’ll do whatever it takes to stop the bastards, include water-boarding) - 2ND AMENDMENT ADVOCATE (arm everyone and the criminals will back off) - SECURE THE BORDERS (starve the bastards out and they will go home) - LAW AND ORDER (enforcement first and foremost) - SOCIAL SECURITY REFORM (the program can’t sustain itself) - DEFEAT THE DEMOCRAT (any fool they put up) – TAX SIMPLIFICATION (choice for the tax payer) - PING!

It’s about time a LEADER like FRED said “enough is enough” of this foolishness. FRED led...the others followed! Huckelberry is still a fool...this debate hasn’t changed my mind on that.


33 posted on 12/12/2007 2:41:40 PM PST by Bobbisox (ALL AMERICAN GRANDMA FREEPER FredHEAD! The Hunt for a FRED November is on! Don't be fooled!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Hey, I like that kind of gumption. I’m impressed.


34 posted on 12/12/2007 2:42:13 PM PST by truthkeeper (It's the borders, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

was when he refused to raise his hand at the behest of the moderator”

elaborate?


35 posted on 12/12/2007 2:42:32 PM PST by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Fred also did a great job in his interview with Sean today. He had only 13 minutes, but he packed a great deal into it and was positive and upbeat! GO FRED!


36 posted on 12/12/2007 2:44:02 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spacekicker

Each of the candidates agreed to the format in advance. Thompson made a quip about the time alotment too. It was a great quip, but it was probably an ‘event’ waiting to happen if you catch my drift.

As for Mitt, I get the same feeling you did on about everything he says. I’m not a big fan.


37 posted on 12/12/2007 2:44:09 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“Windbag, but still, you invite him, you can’t skip over him like that.”

Yeah, but that lady was rudy...lol...I’m not going to correct that. Rude to all the candidates.

Can someone post rudy-drag?


38 posted on 12/12/2007 2:44:38 PM PST by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
I have predicted and will again predict that Fred will make his big showing in South Carolina and will eventually get the nomination.

Fred is the only candidate besides Hunter that represents all of what a conservative could want in a candidate.

Go Fred.

My Check is in the mail, honest.

39 posted on 12/12/2007 2:44:51 PM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donnab

I agree.


40 posted on 12/12/2007 2:45:04 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson