Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Holds Onto Conservative District in Special Congressional Election in Ohio (Good news)
.fox ews. ^ | 12/11/2007 | Associated Press

Posted on 12/11/2007 7:01:17 PM PST by bilhosty

TOLEDO, Ohio — A Republican state lawmaker won a special congressional election Tuesday, hanging onto to a conservative district despite a strong push by Democrats.

Union-backed groups and Democrats were hoping to steal the seat from the GOP and make a big statement going into the 2008 election in Ohio, which is expected to again have a significant role in determining the next president.

Republican Bob Latta defeated Robin Weirauch to complete the term of U.S. Rep. Paul Gillmor who died in September from a fall at his Washington apartment.

Latta, the son of a former Ohio congressman, had 55 percent of the vote and Weirauch had 45 percent with 42 percent of the vote counted.

The 5th District in northwest Ohio is conservative and traditionally Republican. No Democrat has won the seat since the 1930s.

But Latta faced a stronger challenge than expected after winning a close primary race in

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 110th; boblatta; houseelection; latta; ohio; paulgillmor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo

Alas CfG had a different guy than Latta to support. I assume though Latta is miles better than the Dimwit.


21 posted on 12/11/2007 10:38:45 PM PST by WOSG (Pro-life, pro-family, pro-freedom, pro-strong defense, pro-GWOT, pro-capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

seriously.

Thanks for pointing this out. I’m beginning to think that many freepers don’t think before they talk. RNC dumped almost a half million dollars into this race to hold a seat that went 61% for Bush in 2004.

That we held this seat was to be expected. That it was even this close is troubling. That it was this close, with so much RNC help, is doubly troubling.

The RNC won’t be able to help in other congressional races in ‘08, because it’ll be wisely devoting its energy to stopping Hillary/Obama/Edwards. And the DCCC is far outraising the NRCC right now—so the Libs will have the money, not us.

Unless we can find some fricking conservative credentials and show the American People we mean business, 2008 is going to be very, very ugly.


22 posted on 12/11/2007 10:40:49 PM PST by TINS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

yes, he is. Latta would probably have done better, too, without the bitter primary and the opposition of CfG.

That’s a ray of hope in what is otherwise not terribly good news.


23 posted on 12/11/2007 10:45:17 PM PST by TINS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TINS

FWIW, Bush was outspent in 2004 when you add in all the 527s.

Heard it direct from Karl Rove.


24 posted on 12/11/2007 10:47:25 PM PST by WOSG (Pro-life, pro-family, pro-freedom, pro-strong defense, pro-GWOT, pro-capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

yeah. We also heard from Karl Rove how Republicans were going to pick up seats in Congress in ‘06.

I’ve learned to stop listening to Karl Rove. He’s the one who got us into this mess in the first place.


25 posted on 12/11/2007 10:51:24 PM PST by TINS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TINS

The Congressional Republican majorities as well as the entire Bush administration indirectly helped the D’s win in ‘06 by behaving just like Democrats on most of the issues. Conservatives throughout the entire U.S. are truly upset when the Republican Party at every level decides to throw away conservatism instead of always using it to the best of abilities.


26 posted on 12/12/2007 1:30:34 AM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I strongly believe that, like the media creation re the “inevitability” of Billary’s victory, this “inevitability” of Republicans being swept out of office is also a result of wishful thinking and a coordinated effort by the DNC and the MSM working hand in hand.
27 posted on 12/12/2007 3:21:52 AM PST by aroundabout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Americans want politicians committed to protecting America and protecting those who protect America. The Democrats attack those who protect America, like our troops, Counter-terrorism interrogators, and our border patrol agents.

Whichever GOP candidate that supports these men and women in uniform the most actively will win the nomination and the White House. Fred Thompson blew it yesterday when he gave Glen Beck a rambling answer to a softball question about pardoning Compean and Ramos that they He were guilty but "probably" could be considered for commutation because their sentences were a little too harsh. He totally struck out. Giuliani remains the front runner because he does not vacillate or waver when it comes to supporting those in uniform. He would have given a one word answer: "Absolutely". Too bad Fred couldn't figure that out. I've just about given up on him because of his dismal non-performance.
 
28 posted on 12/12/2007 3:48:29 AM PST by counterpunch (Get Up And Go Fred Go Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Americans want politicians committed to protecting America and protecting those who protect America. The Democrats attack those who protect America, like our troops, Counter-terrorism interrogators, and our border patrol agents.

Whichever GOP candidate that supports these men and women in uniform the most actively will win the nomination and the White House. Fred Thompson blew it yesterday when he gave Glen Beck a rambling answer to a softball question about pardoning Compean and Ramos that they were guilty but "probably" could be considered for commutation because their sentences were a little too harsh. He totally struck out. Giuliani remains the front runner because he does not vacillate or waver when it comes to supporting those in uniform. He would have given a one word answer: "Absolutely". Too bad Fred couldn't figure that out. I've just about given up on him because of his dismal non-performance.
 
29 posted on 12/12/2007 3:49:33 AM PST by counterpunch (Get Up And Go Fred Go Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
Maybe the voters will figure out that it is because of Democrats refusal to allow us to drill for, and refine our own oil that gasoline prices are so high. They also refuse to allow nukes to be built to create cheap, safe electricity.

Are voters going to figure it out that Democrats want to destroy our prospering economy by raising taxes. It will result in rising unemployment.

How about our national security? Democrats are on the side of terrorists. They protect them at every turn.

It is also Democrats who want totally open borders. All these are highly Republican issues. Only a fool would vote for a Democrat.

30 posted on 12/12/2007 4:34:40 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TINS
Why? Name one issue on which anyone would prefer a Democrat to a Republican.

The economy?
Illegal immigration?
Engergy?
National security?

31 posted on 12/12/2007 4:45:13 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty

To show how little the drive-bys want to touch this, I’m in Dayton, and didn’t even KNOW this election was going on now!


32 posted on 12/12/2007 4:50:36 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
. . . in order to dive us as a nation.

Nice pun. I think you meant to divide us but the donks certainly want to make us dive as a nation, too.

33 posted on 12/12/2007 4:52:52 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Yeah, I meant divide. Unfortunately FR's messageboard software is still stuck in the '90s so we can't edit our typpos typos.
 
34 posted on 12/12/2007 5:28:35 AM PST by counterpunch (Get Up And Go Fred Go Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty

It must be good news. Not a peep out the LameStreamMedia.


35 posted on 12/12/2007 5:30:13 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TINS

I agree that this is nothing to get excited about, but you are way off on the “this close” comments. Spending money doesn’t simply translate into more votes, otherwise we’d all spend a billion dollars each election. There’s a limit.

We held the seat with about the same vote margin as the last election, with a guy that was NOT the incumbent. That’s a good sign that the republicans are back to being republicans.

The spending helps get name recognition for your candidate, but both sides spent enough for that. Turnout was OK, and the republicans were willing to show up as much as the democrats (leading to the reasonable margin of victory).

A couple of years ago the special election to fill Goss’ seat was extremely close — that was a harbinger of doom which came to pass in 2006. Maybe this shows that, with democrats in charge, people are forgetting the corruption of the Taft administration.


36 posted on 12/12/2007 5:35:06 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
FWIW, Bush was outspent in 2004 when you add in all the 527s.

I lived in Cuyahoga county Ohio in 2004 and kept tripping over smelly hippies working for "Americans Coming Together" so yes I'd say that the Dems way outspent us in Ohiio in 2004 when adding in the 527's.

37 posted on 12/12/2007 5:40:17 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Fred On, apply directly to the WhiteHouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bilhosty

Best news in a long time. Thanks for the post.


38 posted on 12/12/2007 5:41:31 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

You mean that most recent Taft who tried to run Ohio, not those of a century ago, right? (Least I hope that’s what you mean).


39 posted on 12/12/2007 5:49:52 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TINS
That we held this seat was to be expected. That it was even this close is troubling. That it was this close, with so much RNC help, is doubly troubling.

LOL. Close? It was a landslide win. Gillmor won in 2006 57% to 43%. He was an incumbent. This was a special election with the Rep running against a Dem who had run for the office in 2002 and 2004. The fact that Latta won 56.8 per cent to 42.9 percent and took all of the counties in the district is a decisive victory and far from troubling. Are you a troll?

40 posted on 12/12/2007 6:03:03 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson