Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/05/2007 3:25:23 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Syncro; knews_hound; jellybean

ping


2 posted on 12/05/2007 3:26:13 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog
From amazon.com:

What a great CHRISTMAS PRESENT!

3 posted on 12/05/2007 3:29:17 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

FR Rules ya know.

4 posted on 12/05/2007 3:29:49 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

May Senator McCarthy be vindicated at long last!


5 posted on 12/05/2007 3:30:08 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vayo'mer Par`oh 'el-`avadayv; "Hanimtza' khazeh, 'ish 'asher ruach 'Eloqim bo?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

geez, i love ann
6 posted on 12/05/2007 3:30:23 PM PST by robomatik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

The Rosenbergs were guilty. McCarthy was right and Alger Hiss was a communist.......


7 posted on 12/05/2007 3:30:35 PM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog
DEAR NATIONAL REVIEW: Your fake dispatches from Lebanon are more interesting than whining liberals writing book reviews of books they haven't read and don't have the guts to write.

Ooooh! Thats going to leave a mark...
12 posted on 12/05/2007 3:38:26 PM PST by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

BTTT


13 posted on 12/05/2007 3:40:20 PM PST by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

"...It must be painful for Radosh to read a thrilling historical account of Soviet espionage without every accusation against a liberal having to be surrounded by 400 excuses, as in Radosh's excruciating books.

This contemptible Uriah Heep patronizingly writes, for example..." - Ann Coulter
For those of us more familiar with the the "Uriah Heep" the ROCK GROUP than the "Uriah Heep" the DICKENS CHARACTER, see also, from wikipedia.:
Uriah Heep (David Copperfield)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Drawing by Fred Barnard

Drawing by Fred Barnard
Uriah Heep is a fictional character created by Charles Dickens in his novel David Copperfield.

The character is notable for his cloying humility, obsequiousness, and general insincerity. His references to David as "Master Copperfield" are repeated so often that they quickly seem insincere...


14 posted on 12/05/2007 3:42:15 PM PST by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog
This book,

Should be required reading for every person in this nation and particularly 435 congressmen and 100 senators!

But I doubt that it will happen.

16 posted on 12/05/2007 3:44:26 PM PST by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog
But the essence of what McCarthy was saying was: Let's get into this a bit. How could Whittaker Chambers meet with FDR's Assistant Secretary of State Adolf Berle in 1939, reveal massive Soviet penetration of the Roosevelt administration, and still have these same Soviet spies swarming through Democratic administrations a decade later?

How could Truman have nominated known Soviet spy Harry Dexter White to be U.S. director of the International Monetary Fund in 1946? How could Truman still be denying Alger Hiss was a Soviet agent in 1956?

Democrats want endless, pontifical investigations into how 9/11 happened, but they can't comprehend why McCarthy wanted an investigation into how an immense network of Soviet spies managed to run rampant through the Democratic administrations of Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman.

That does indeed sum it up very nicely. Wonder why those questions haven't been adequately answered to this very day?

17 posted on 12/05/2007 3:52:46 PM PST by Bigun (IRS sucks @getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

I will be happy to teach Ann how to flyfish


18 posted on 12/05/2007 3:56:25 PM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

“How could Whittaker Chambers meet with FDR’s Assistant Secretary of State Adolf Berle in 1939, reveal massive Soviet penetration of the Roosevelt administration, and still have these same Soviet spies swarming through Democratic administrations a decade later?”

Truman and Roosevelt and their administration were Communists. It wasn’t just the loss of China, but also the loss of Eastern Europe, the loss of half Korea.

Who benefitted the most from the nuking of Japan?

Communist China.

It’s easy after the passage of time to see what the major outcomes of major decisions were.

Anyone who doesn’t think Roosevelt was a Commie should study his agenda.


20 posted on 12/05/2007 4:01:55 PM PST by plenipotentiary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

Not for nothing did Bill Buckley call Miss Coulter “Tailgunner Ann”.


22 posted on 12/05/2007 4:03:56 PM PST by Southern Partisan ("Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less." ----R. E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

Thank you Ann Coulter. It’s about time somebody took Radosh to task for being such a limp, appeasing noodle. I hope he tries to defend himself so she can do it again.


23 posted on 12/05/2007 4:16:55 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog; All
Amazon.com -- Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies
25 posted on 12/05/2007 4:28:13 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog


28 posted on 12/05/2007 4:40:37 PM PST by Stepan12 ( "We are all girlymen now." Conservative reaction to Ann Coulter's anti PC joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog
Thank you so much for posting this Ron.

You made my day.

I love it when the ongoing liberal/socialist attempt to redefine history FAILS.

This book means abject and complete historical failure for the Dems. Since they cannot argue with it, they will ignore the book. So it will be our job to repeatedly stick it right in their twisted faces!

All liberals are Utopians anyway, who want ( Communist) heaven on earth. Some one should tell them you have to die to get there! LOL.

OF course Anne is doing a great job at just that!

That sends the libs right around the bend!( The Libs do not have bright sexy women, they are either ugly trying to be bright OR physically attractive but mentally scattered. The libs just can't figure Anne out. Why?

Because she IS extremely bright AND sexy.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

( SIGH)

37 posted on 12/05/2007 5:43:04 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog

44 posted on 12/05/2007 7:36:54 PM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (NY Times: "fake but accurate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RonDog
BUMP another masterpiece from Ann!

But what does she have against Uriah heep, anyway?


49 posted on 12/05/2007 8:28:07 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson