Posted on 12/04/2007 2:07:48 PM PST by Sub-Driver
Sorry, the authors of the aforementioned book interviewed heads of the Iraqi nuke weapons programme.
This was a checkmate presser, he essentially said 'y'all can read the NIE, but the parties interested know exactly where they stand.'
W is entirely transparent with his body language: when he's worried, he expresses it via tight, worried speech and stature; when he's triumphant you see loose, mellow, expressive, elaborate response to the press.
So exactly when did Israel come to the U.S. with new info on a certain Syrian riverside site??
I've read all of Clancy's novels (in the chronological order Clancy putatively intended), and several of Dave Hunt's books (agreeing nearly 100% with the doctrine presented), nevertheless I do dispute (quite vehemently) that "disinformation" is actually a word.
I've also read a great many of Heinlein's books.
There's a great deal of philosophical wisdom presented in Heinlein's many works, but I depart company from his ideologies in that he purports in large part ideas attributable in large part to concepts that ere pragmatically unworkable in the same sense as idealistic communism is. For that matter, practical communism is just as unworkable. I can't decide if the converse, i.e., libertarianism, is practically unworkable.
I'm inclined to feel that libertarianism, like communist/socialist ideals, is both unpractical and unpragmatic.
"Disinformation" is not a word. The point being that somethings been going on, is afoot, or is actively being covered up. Ask yourself: what motivation would the "victim" acquiesce to such "cover-up"?
And I'm not entertaining "supernatural" explanations. When that happens, in accordance to Christian/Jewish eschatology, everybody will know it (and there'll be a ready defense in place).
Whatever occured 6 Sept 07 is being as we speak at Annapolis. That the Rapture could occure the instant the "Annapolis Announcement" is presented is irrelevant and frankly, not germane, to the matter at hand.
Here and now, there will be no islamonukes in the ME as long as Israel stands. We got her back. If the islamos really, really want to push it, we're right there with the answer alongside Israel.
You pray Israel stays out of the mix? Israel is IN the mix, and will manage the situation, with our help as necessary.
Question...when did the Iranian General(former Def. Sec.) defect? And could he be the source of this new information. Also recently it was announced by Iran they replaced there main guy at the nuclear talks....and have since charged he was spying for the Brits...he could be the source and ..was blown getting us the newest info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.