Skip to comments.
F-35 JSF Hit by Serious Design Problems
Defense Industry Daily ^
| 3 December 2007
| Johan Boeder
Posted on 12/03/2007 4:24:34 PM PST by Yo-Yo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
The Eurofighter and the Grippen may stage a comeback if the JSF falls too far behind.
1
posted on
12/03/2007 4:24:38 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
To: Yo-Yo
"The fault was caused by a shortcoming in the 270 volt system, when a lead inside a box touched the lid. A complete review of close-tolerance spacing and all electrical boxes is necessary." Doesn't sound like a show-stopper to me. Put a good coating of insulating parylene on the inside of those box lids -- and, perhaps, shorten or tie down that "lead" a tad -- and they should be good to go.
2
posted on
12/03/2007 5:18:42 PM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: TXnMA
I agree. May take some doing for the fixes but is doable. Could be a lot worse.
To: TXnMA
Kapton tape. More wear resistant than Parylene.
I was afraid it would be something fundamental, like using a MicroSoft OS...
4
posted on
12/03/2007 5:33:03 PM PST
by
null and void
(No more Bushes/No more Clintons)
To: Yo-Yo
Gadzooks! Those who moan and cry "The sky is falling!" fail to recall that there has never, ever been any airplane (or tank, rifle, ballpoint pin, etc) that went through initial testing without problems!
The Abrams Tank was a full and complete failure to folk of this ilk until it became the best MBT on the planet!
The list goes on and on and on...
5
posted on
12/03/2007 5:37:12 PM PST
by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: Yo-Yo
This is so bogus, all new fighter designs are flawed. It takes years to work the bugs out. This is the problem with “Bleeding Edge Technology” the warrior’s want a technological advantage in combat, and they demand that they get it before any potential enemy does. This results in lower reliability, and sometimes the complete scraping of a weapon system if the bugs can’t be worked out. Just look at the engine problems with the F-15, or the problems with the V-22 osprey, or the turbine engine problems with the M-1 MBT. As far as competion from other designs goes, isn’t the F-35 JSF further along in development than any of these others, and what makes anyone think there will be no problems with their designs. “There are always design flaws” this is what all the testing is for.
6
posted on
12/03/2007 5:45:46 PM PST
by
Eagle74
(From time to time the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots)
To: Yo-Yo
F-35 JSF Hit by Serious Design Problems
If they had only let it evolve!
7
posted on
12/03/2007 5:52:24 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: Bender2
It sounds like the biggest problem is that the market for this plane might be occupied by other aircraft, if these design issues delay production too much.
8
posted on
12/03/2007 6:00:21 PM PST
by
Fraxinus
(My opinion worth what you paid.)
To: Fraxinus
Not when you include limited Stealth. The F-35 still has everybody else beat in that respect.
9
posted on
12/03/2007 6:41:34 PM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Yo-Yo
The F-35C naval variant's Hamilton Sundstrand power generator was mistakenly designed to only 65% of the required electric output. Hard to understand how this kind of thing can happen in today's project management world. Kind of like the Mars probe with the miles/kilometer mixup (or whatever the story was).
To accommodate the required increase, it will also be necessary to redesign the gearbox for the standard Pratt & Whitney F135 engine
This isn't really superficial stuff.
During a test run of the F135 engine, part of the engine was blown up by overheating.
Glad it happened during a test run.
10
posted on
12/03/2007 7:50:40 PM PST
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā¢)
To: Yo-Yo
Normally whenever the JSF takes an itty-bitty baby step, the manufacturer reports it to the media for PR purposes. First engine run? Reported. Roll-out? Reported. First flight? Reported. First Wheel-up flight? Reported First flight is an "itty-bitty baby step"?? No bias here...
11
posted on
12/03/2007 8:11:45 PM PST
by
jrp
To: null and void
"Kapton tape. More wear resistant than Parylene." Same basic material -- but, I agree that Kapton tape is better, because it can be made thicker. I was just trying to save a few milligrams of weight...
"I was afraid it would be something fundamental, like using a MicroSoft OS..."
LOL!!! You nailed that one!!!
12
posted on
12/03/2007 8:46:06 PM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: null and void
Technically
Parylene is a polyxylene, and
Kapton is a polyimide.
For the stated application, Kapton is superior, but you have to be careful in adhesive selection for the tape form in the avionic environment.
13
posted on
12/03/2007 8:58:53 PM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: TXnMA
Krapton wire shielding or kapton tape?
If it is the shielding, they should retrofit the wires.
14
posted on
12/03/2007 11:20:18 PM PST
by
Jet Jaguar
(Who would the terrorists vote for?)
To: F15Eagle
15
posted on
12/03/2007 11:54:22 PM PST
by
Wiz
To: Yo-Yo
Interesting. Thanks for posting. Go Gordo!
America’s finest!
16
posted on
12/04/2007 12:48:50 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: Jet Jaguar
There are many things they could do to keep 270V “leads” from shorting to the “box lids”. Heck, the plane is full of composites — they could even make the “lids” out of a non-conducting material...
17
posted on
12/04/2007 4:42:41 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
To: TXnMA
The real question is why the hell didn't they catch this in design reviews, or in unit testing?!
18
posted on
12/04/2007 6:05:22 AM PST
by
Erasmus
(My simplifying explanation had the disconcerting side effect of making the subject incomprehensible.)
To: Yo-Yo
If we had only outsourced this projects R&D and manufacture to China we could fly the F-35 right out of the box. Be sure to require a decal stating “Warning, do not lick the paint” on each unit.
Test flights are not required just for show. Even the 737 is still a “work in progress”.
19
posted on
12/04/2007 6:27:44 AM PST
by
CHEE
(ha)
To: Erasmus
My guess is that it was a manufacturing failure that left too much slack in the “lead”. Most things like that are left to “best practice” (rather than design toilerances) in today’s “QC-check your own work” idiocy...
20
posted on
12/04/2007 8:14:26 AM PST
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson