Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Somebody Is Lying About FISA
The Examiner ^ | 12/3/07 | Melanie Scarborough

Posted on 12/03/2007 6:36:29 AM PST by steve-b

As a technician for AT&T, Mark Klein says he helped connect a device three years ago that copied onto a government supercomputer every phone call, e-mail and Internet search made through the company's network.

"AT&T provided the National Security Agency with everything that ordinary Americans communicated over the Internet," Klein said recently on Capitol Hill. "This program included not only AT&T customers, but everyone who used the Internet because AT&T carries messages for other carriers also."

President Bush denies that. "We're not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans," he said. "Our efforts are focused on links to al Qaeda and their known affiliates. The privacy of ordinary Americans is fiercely protected in all our activities."

Only one of those men can be telling the truth. That the White House is frantically lobbying weak links in the Senate to pass a revised Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) granting immunity for AT&T and other telecom companies suggests who fears exposure....

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: fisa; internet; whistleblower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: ShadowAce

Isn’t it interesting how someone can acquire just enough technical jargon to say something really, abysmally stupid about technology? One of my current favorites is the 3-minute battery recharge - the amount of current required would turn the car into a puddle of molten metal.


21 posted on 12/03/2007 8:16:25 AM PST by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks

Seems technically impossible to me, but I dunno.

I’ll defer to those who actually know something about the technology.

So far the thread seems to be 3-0 against the technical feasibility of this claimed intrusion.


22 posted on 12/03/2007 8:25:02 AM PST by secretagent (Reduce government to courts and nukes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Old news, from May 2006

Wonder why it’s being rehashed now.

(He’s also an ex-employee - anyone know if the parting w/ AT&T was mutual?)


23 posted on 12/03/2007 10:02:28 AM PST by KosmicKitty (WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubGeniusX
Only one of those men can be telling the truth.

But I think the answer is somewhere in the middle. Copying all data? No way. Loading pen traces and email addresses into a big data wharehousing system to tie phone numbers and email addresses to terrorists? Quite possible. That lets our government know who they should be paying attention to.

24 posted on 12/03/2007 10:05:06 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

bmflr

.

.

.

Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo


25 posted on 12/03/2007 10:36:17 AM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
And while we’re at it, why is it legal for Google to cherry pick anything it wants from the internet, but not legal for our government to trace terrorists messages to each other?

Go ahead, type your name into Google. You’ll probably find messages on one site or another that you don’t even remember posting.

As far as I know, Google doesn't search Outlook or Outlook Express or Thunderbird mail files, etc, on your personal hard drive, just web sites.  

26 posted on 12/03/2007 11:20:36 AM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

AMEN, you speak with facts not emotion.


27 posted on 12/03/2007 11:28:06 AM PST by bmwcyle (BOMB, BOMB, BOMB,.......BOMB, BOMB IRAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

I have a very close relative who is involved with intel gathering. Some of what the post says is true. While I am not privy to secrets, I’m told they don’t store them for any length of time, everything is passed through filters. They are searching for words, phrases, hints, etc of impending attacks, and other nefarious actions that would harm our Country.

If something happened that we could have prevented, and we found out it could have been prevented by using technological means, I would be among the first to raise hell about it. Who wouldn’t?

I ain’t got nuttin’ to hide, and if I did, I would hide it!


28 posted on 12/03/2007 11:35:32 AM PST by papasmurf (Now I lay me down to sleep, and Pray for the RINO's huge defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Only one of those men can be telling the truth.

Not so.

29 posted on 12/03/2007 11:40:04 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson