[js1138]

The reason that alleles have a limited number of forms for any given gene is that the gene really isn’t mutating so much as processing information differently based upon environmental inputs.

Have you ever stopped to quantify this assertion? You realize, of course, that nearly all differences between a wolf and a teacup poodle are covered by your "limited number of forms."

Not to mention the difference between you and Einstein, which may be even greater.

Most of evolution is variation at the level of allele variation. In the years after the evolutionary synthesis, evolution was defined as a change in allele frequency in populations.

[Southack]

Most of Evolution is a pretty theory that sounds good if you are drinking heavily in college, but hardly the stuff of the next generation of science.

That the same genes can be considered to be mutated when they simply perform a function in a different manner based upon a changed local environment...just goes to show that even Darwinists are beginning to realize that the DNA programming song remains the same (little Led Zep allusion for ya).

Same gene...no evolution.

Darwinists need to study more computer science. Data processing and coding (genetic or otherwise) is already aptly understood in *that* branch of science.

[Southack]

"You realize, of course, that nearly all differences between a wolf and a teacup poodle are covered by your "limited number of forms." Not to mention the difference between you and Einstein, which may be even greater." - js1138

Wait. Let me guess. Once again poor js1138 has to resort to attacking Southack personally rather than dealing with actual substance.