Most of Evolution is a pretty theory that sounds good if you are drinking heavily in college, but hardly the stuff of the next generation of science.
That the same genes can be considered to be mutated when they simply perform a function in a different manner based upon a changed local environment...just goes to show that even Darwinists are beginning to realize that the DNA programming song remains the same (little Led Zep allusion for ya).
Same gene...no evolution.
Darwinists need to study more computer science. Data processing and coding (genetic or otherwise) is already aptly understood in *that* branch of science.
Computer "scientists" should study some genetics and evolution before they shoot their mouths off on a subject about which they know little.
Four or five years at the grad level should be sufficient.
I'm beginning to see where you diverge from every other thinker on the subject. It's truly sad that the Dover school board didn't have the foresight to hire you and GGG to defend them. That would have been quite a show.
You might even have gotten to mention code skipping under oath. And GGG could have told them about degeneration.