Correct me if I am wrong. I thought you said that Ron Paul was characterized by contraryism. If not, what were you saying?
I’ll put it another way.
Ron Paul uses contrarism as others use creativity.
Bottom line is he votes against things, then when questioned about it cites ‘its not in the Constitution’ as if thats a viable explanation.
Its not, its a dodge.
Especially if you’ve glanced at the Constitution, and noted there is no mention of shrimp subsidies....