I’ll put it another way.
Ron Paul uses contrarism as others use creativity.
Bottom line is he votes against things, then when questioned about it cites ‘its not in the Constitution’ as if thats a viable explanation.
Its not, its a dodge.
Especially if you’ve glanced at the Constitution, and noted there is no mention of shrimp subsidies....
Is that the best you can do on his voting record? Just keep hammering on shrimp?
You're digging your hole deeper. A couple of examples of how. Paul voted FOR the Reagan and Bush tax cuts and FOR spending CUTS. The National Taxpayers Union rates him so high, for example, because of his record of voting FOR spending cuts as well as against spending increases. Now if you think that votes for spending cuts and tax cuts are "contrarian" and "uncreative" you must have despised Reagan.