“In other words, the title of this post is 180 degrees opposite from the truth.”
The title is, “Senator Thompson voted Clinton ‘not guilty’ of perjury.” That’s a straightforward statement of fact:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/02/12/senate.vote/
Fred has done a lot of funny things being the fact he was from a Protected Red state makes one wonder!
How hard was it for Fred to be a conservative in a Red state and still not be 100% and to join the CFT etc.
It's also intended to be a misleading statement people by omitting the important fact that Fred did vote for a conviction on the other count.
Fred's vote did not affect the final outcome, and it's not an issue today. We managed to slow Clinton's domestic agenda to a crawl for two years, so it was a worthwhile effort even without removing The Sink Emperor from office.
Using CNN as your reference pretty much says all anyone needs to know....
Keep trying though, you just continue to discredit yourself and, by association, your candidate.
Please! More transparent misrepresentations! Don’t stop now, your almost there!!