Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kurt Evans
That’s a straightforward statement of fact

It's also intended to be a misleading statement people by omitting the important fact that Fred did vote for a conviction on the other count.

Fred's vote did not affect the final outcome, and it's not an issue today. We managed to slow Clinton's domestic agenda to a crawl for two years, so it was a worthwhile effort even without removing The Sink Emperor from office.

14 posted on 11/30/2007 2:06:38 AM PST by HAL9000 (Fred Thompson/Mike Huckabee 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000

“It’s also intended to be a misleading statement people by omitting the important fact that Fred did vote for a conviction on the other count.”

I wasn’t talking about other votes. I was talking about the perjury vote. There’s nothing misleading about it.

“Fred’s vote did not affect the final outcome, and it’s not an issue today.”

If Clinton had been convicted of perjury, he would have been removed from office. Senator Thompson’s “not guilty” vote affected the final outcome every bit as much as the “not guilty” votes cast by Democrats. And it is an issue today because it raises questions about Senator Thompson’s character.


21 posted on 11/30/2007 2:38:09 AM PST by Kurt Evans (This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson