Posted on 11/28/2007 11:20:02 AM PST by reasonmclucus
TOPEKA - A consumer group is asking Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to explain whether her administration tried to influence a decision on a request to develop wind energy or set electricity rates.
David Springe, attorney for the Citizens Utility Ratepayer Board, said he is not alleging any wrongdoing by Sebelius in Westar Energy Inc.'s request to the Kansas Corporation Commission for a rate increase to build the largest wind-generated electricity program in the state.
But Springe said an internal e-mail from Westar and statements made by Sebelius and others demands answers.
Westar's CEO Jim Haines wrote other utility executives in December 2006, saying Sebelius promised they would be "fully compensated" for building wind power projects.
CURB wants to know what assurances, if any, were given to Westar and other utilities that they would receive favorable treatment from the KCC to increase monthly electric bills to pay for new wind turbines.
"We need to at least act and make sure the process is fair," Springe said. "We really don't know the answer. The board hopes that what we get from the commission is affirmation that haven't made any promises to any parties."
Sebelius' spokeswoman Nicole Corcoran said no assurances were given to utilities that they would get special treatment by the KCC, but they were told they would be compensated through the rate process for their investment.
"The governor never advised members of the KCC which utility applications they should approve, how they should set rates, or what those rates should be," Corcoran said in a statement. "The implication by CURB is off base."
The questions arise from Westar's request for pre-approval from the KCC to increase electric rates to develop wind energy.
CURB has asked that that two KCC members, Michael Moffet and Thomas Wright, recuse themselves from hearing Westar's request, or state why they should stay on the case.
A third member, Joseph Harkins, recused himself earlier this year. He was Sebelius' energy adviser from 2003 to 2006 before being appointed to the KCC in June. Moffet was appointed in 2004 and Wright in May.
Westar is using a procedure adopted in 2003 by the Legislature as a means to encourage alternative energy development. It allows utilities to file a request with the KCC to increase rates which would be used to recover costs of constructing wind or other energy sources.
Technical hearings are scheduled for three days next week, with a decision to be announced by Dec. 31.
If approved, Westar would move forward with three wind projects, then return to the KCC for a formal rate increase request.
Springe said the law requires the KCC to approve the request. His concern is that the amount Westar is seeking is too high compared to the increase needed if Westar purchased wind power from other sources.
Westar's filings with the KCC estimate monthly residential bills would increase between $2 and $2.50. Springe argues the rate could be closer to $4 a month, when factoring in a rate of return for Westar shareholders.
State policy has advocated the cheapest form of power for Kansans, though federal reports estimate wind power will remain more expensive than coal, natural gas and nuclear power.
Springe said the expedited nature of Westar's request and disclosures made CURB's filing necessary. The KCC's policy in wind development and cost recovery will set the stage for future projects. Allowing Westar the more expensive alternative of owning the wind turbines turns the policy on end.
"The board is not suggesting that they can't recover the wind cost. We believe the decision to purchase power is cheaper than to own it. We support wind power, but want it to be acquired in the cheapest manner," Springe said.
In May, Sebelius held a news conference with Westar and other utility officials announcing an agreement to voluntarily commit to getting 10 percent of the state's energy from renewable sources by 2010, and 20 percent by 2020.
Haines said he and others would "do their share" in December to reach those goals, provided they could recover the costs.
Lt. Gov. Mark Parkinson was at the December gathering and continued to meet with Westar and others to discuss energy issues, according to documents filed with the KCC. Parkinson has been leading the administration's efforts to develop its energy policy.
-—I assume this is also the windmill project that needed the coal-plant powerline for grid tie-in??
I didn’t notice a party affiliation, is she a Dem?
Governor Sebelius is an Independent, apparently, since no political affiliation is mentioned in this article.
She’s a carpet-bagging RAT from Ohio. There’s a number of corruption-ridden scandals regarding KS RATS going on. The power-plant veto is only one of them. Tiller the late-term abortionist has had a number of prominent RATS blatantly in his pocket for years. The media is RAT-controlled, so the RAT corruption gets little exposure.
She’s a RAT.
According to Wikipedia - “Kathleen Gilligan Sebelius (born May 15, 1948) is currently serving as the forty-fourth Governor of Kansas. She is the second female governor of the state of Kansas, and is currently chairwoman of the Democratic Governors Association.”
That explains why there is no party affiliation listed in the article.
~~ AGW™ ping~~
Dem
You don't say! Who'd a thunk it?!?
A very, liberal Dim (father lib dim from Ohio), who, along with other dims and most especially RINOs, have turned KS into yet another high tax, corrupt state.
NOT Independent but Liberal DimocRAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes, she’s delivered Ohio-style democrat politics to Kansas with $9 million (a record times 4) in cheesy TV ads. Happy to say that since playing Blanco on Greensburg, getting drunk and making fun of Kansas at a public event in Seattle, and this scandal, her rating in KS is down 27%. This among people who have spent the past 5 years thinking she’s just a nice old lady. What’s amazing is that the KS press is actually showing some interest.
In her attempts to convince utility companies to pay for these high cost energy alternatives (that forced the utility companies to ask the Kansas Corporation Commission for a rate increase), she has assured these energy companies that they would be "fully compensated" for the cost of the development for these alternative energy sources.
The problem is that the regulatory body that sets utility rates is designed to be an independent organization.
This begs the question, if the Kansas Corporation Commission is an independent regulatory body that sets utility rates, how could the Governor assure utility companies that they would be "fully compensated" without influencing a rate increase?
Here are a couple of other articles about this situation.
Role in wind projects up in air
Consumer group asks whether Sebelius used undue influence
Wichita Eagle
CURB: Did Sebelius exert influence?
Salina Journal
Group questions Sebelius' influence in wind case
Wichita Eagle Editorial
KCC must be independent in rate case
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.