Posted on 11/27/2007 12:34:05 AM PST by Jeff Fuller
Thank you for the offer.
We'll just settle for the Presidential nomination.
--AiT, Another Vote in the DUNCAN HUNTER column
bump
Your claim is at odds with recent polls that show the top 5 GOP candidates winning out against Hillary. And btw, a vote for Huckabee is a vote for Huckabee. The article is tripe. (and personally, I'd prefer Duncan Hunter)
This is the only way to secure the conservative base. Romney, Rudy and Huckabee aint got it...McCain is a joke altogether.
Get a conservative candidate or go to the polls without a base.
The message has not changed from day one, it will happen.
Even closer to the truth a vote for Romney is a vote for Hillary.
Rudyhad two chances to beat Hillary. He ran scared both times.
You mentioned in another thread displeasure with his notion of fair-trade - namely, holding a mirror up to China’s trade policy toward the U.S. and applying it to them. You will want to consider, however, that this particular brand of patriotic populism will help back the Reagan Democrats, a crucial constituency if we are to keep the Hildabeast out of the WH. If this is the one thing someone dislikes about him, then considering all the flaws and warts of the other candidates... seems pretty minor.
That's ridiculous and that all-or-nothing thinking is why some are perpetually confused/surprised by what happens in the real world.
I don’t want to settle for the nomination. He has to actually win the presidency and that’s a pretty big jump from a congressman
ROOTY!
Why would any social conservative vote for a flaming blue state liberal like Romney. Romney is a strong supporter of abortion on demand as a means of birth control, (He had this seared in his mind when a relative allegedly died of a back alley abortion). He just instituted socialized medicine in Mass, that Hillary has admitted was the inspiration for her own universal health care plan. Romney has also been a big supporter of the homosexual agenda. So why again should any conservative vote for Romney.
At least Rudy doesn’t lie about being a big lib.
a) Duncan Hunter pitted against Hitlery, would not ABSOLUTELY CLEAN HER CLOCK in debates?
and
b) You would not support him against her?
And in a pefect world, it would be that simple. But guess what, unless you choose to live in a fantasy world, that's not the way it is in real life.
In a general election, you are voting for someone, as well as against someone, and even if you don't vote as all, your actions have serious ramifications. The Perot useful idiots gave us Clinton. FACT! Your bubble world didn't exist.
it’s a major tax increase. just because other countries are socialist doesn’t mean we have to copy them to ‘fight’ back.
You are entitled to your opinion, of course.
Rudy is more of a threat to the conservative movement than Hillary.
of course I would support him if he was pitted against Hillary. I would also support Tancredo.
how come nobody is for Tancredo???
Because after all of the illegals were deported, the guy wouldn't have one clue how to be chief executive of the world's only hyper power.
like that really matters?
all kidding aside, it is hard enough for even a senator to win the presidency, let alone a congressman
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.