Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Says Thompson Has No Record, After Thompson Criticizes Him for Talking Up Big Apple Days
Fox News ^ | November 25, 2007

Posted on 11/25/2007 9:55:24 AM PST by dano1

Rudy Giuliani told FOX News on Saturday that GOP rival Fred Thompson has "no record," after Thompson repeatedly took shots at Giuliani for supporting gun control legislation and bringing up his record as mayor of New York City on the campaign trail.

"Fred has no record to talk about ... I have a good record to talk about so I am very proud of it," Giuliani said while campaigning in Nashua, N.H. "If you didn't have a good record you would want to run away from it. And if you had no record at all, you would want to attack somebody else's record, which is what I think some of my opponents are doing. They don't have the record of results that I have so instead ... they attack you."

The accusation came after Thompson chided Giuliani Friday while visiting a New Hampshire gun store.

"(Giuliani) simply supported just about every gun control legislation that came down the pike. And I just disagree with him on that.... over the years and he's been very outspoken about it. Of course he's not outspoken about it anymore," Thompson told reporters with a smile. "It's a major differentiation. He relates everything to New York City ... Well, New York City is not emblematic of the rest of the country.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; fredthompson; giuliani; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: mylife

True, but Rudy has no Federal experience, Fred does. It’s a wash really.


41 posted on 11/25/2007 5:19:24 PM PST by Free Vulcan (No prisoners. No mercy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

Its not a wash. Its a tidal wave.

Rooty is wrong for America


42 posted on 11/25/2007 5:22:07 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: scarface367
Oh, scarface, tell me again why Rudy would make such a wonderful president:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1921174/posts?page=96#96

Still in love with Rudy, eh?

"Oh, Rudy, it turns me on when you talk tough like that. Do it again, Rudy. You make me feel sooooooo safe. Oh, Ruuuuuuuuudy."

ROFL!

Rudy is a punk who would never be able to gain the respect of our troops just as he was never able to gain the respect of New York's first responders. He is a draft-dodging, cross-dressing, adulterous coward who is pro-abortion and opposed to protecting our borders.

And you would force our troops to salute Rudy?

43 posted on 11/25/2007 5:24:54 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tear gas

So you are incapable of adding anything except for childish insults? How old are you, 12?. Get back to me when you have facts or something intellectual to add to the discussion.


44 posted on 11/25/2007 6:16:14 PM PST by scarface367 (The problem is we have yet to find a cure for stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: scarface367
You shouldn't be ashamed of your affection for Rudy. Tell the world about it!

Oh, Ruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuudy.

ROFL.

Rudy is the one person I'm CERTAIN won't be elected. There's enough of us out here to beat him in the primaries or, if need be, in the general. He will NEVER be in a position to humiliate our troops!

45 posted on 11/25/2007 6:22:28 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

You go right ahead on and not vote for one of the two men who are most likely to receive the nomination. All you’ll do is help bring back the Clinton Criminal enterprise. If you disliked x42 so much that you’ll refuse to vote for Fred because he happened to not have voted against x42, on the LEAST important part of the impeachment vote, which wasn’t relevant anyway, since NONE of the Democrats voted for EITHER charge, you’ll just get his harridan wife as President, and he’ll be back hogging the airwaves. Do you truly want that?


46 posted on 11/25/2007 6:38:26 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Great link, and shows exactly what Fred said which is the truth! The MSM has their opinion, FOX has their opinion and more importantly, the citizens of America who have heard Fred’s message and have looked at his record have their opinion. The primary elections will show whom the majority of Americans in each state want to have at the top of the Republican ticket. GO FRED!


47 posted on 11/25/2007 6:54:44 PM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson