Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radioactivity's danger overstated?
shortnews ^ | 11/24/2007 | short news

Posted on 11/24/2007 7:30:58 PM PST by Flavius

A number of studies conducted at the sites of some of the worst radiation incidents in history have concluded that the danger from radiation isn't as great as was previously believed.

Deaths from radiation incidents including the nuclear bombs dropped on Japan in WW2 and Russian nuclear accidents such as Chernobyl were in the hundreds, not tens of thousands. The risk of genetic deformity was also lower than expected.

(Excerpt) Read more at shortnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nukes; radiation; radioactivity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: bannie
Go eat your bowl of lead, and we’ll discuss this later.

I quit buying and chewing Chinese made toys, thank you.

61 posted on 11/25/2007 2:44:43 AM PST by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: riored

Both

Btw, DU is less than half as radioactive as natural uranium, which, in turn, is quite safe to handle (though not to inhale).


62 posted on 11/25/2007 3:14:38 AM PST by atomic conspiracy (Rousing the blog-rabble since 9-11-01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: redhead; ASOC; Monkey Face
I once worked with a guy that was born with a cleft palate.

His father was one of the Army personnel that was subjected to a nuclear test blast. His father suffered all sorts of health problems later in life.

(I don't remember the details, that job being about twenty-five years ago.)

63 posted on 11/25/2007 5:18:05 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
I and many of my mates handled DU rounds on the Nellis Range complex - cleaning up after the A 10 AT&E. NO one of us (I keep in touch with more than a few) have shown any ill effects.

If I understand correctly, DU radiates only alpha particles, which don't even penetrate skin or clothes. Beta and gamma ray emitters are much more dangerous to handle, and nuclear explosions and reactors can emit neutrons that can make ordinary elements radioactive.

64 posted on 11/25/2007 5:29:18 AM PST by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke; redhead

There were several people who were are contemporaries, and half a generation older who were born with cleft palates. Our town seemed to have a lot of “different” maladies.

In my own graduating class, we’ve lost a total of 19 people, so far, most to various cancers.

I’ll never be convinced that Downwinders are not “different.” We’ve suffered. Period.


65 posted on 11/25/2007 7:22:00 AM PST by Monkey Face (If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Monkey Face
In an "Intro to Engineering" class, during a data collection exercise, the prof said somebody once noticed that people living in certain houses [in a Czech village] didn't live too long.

Turns out that the houses were built from waste material from the local cobalt mine that still had excessive residual radiation.

66 posted on 11/25/2007 8:00:52 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke; redhead

Why am I not surprised by that?

I don’t think our parents even knew the dangers of being Downwinders. I think only select government officials knew, and the school board was only given enough information to distribute the iodine tablets. (They were truly nasty things, too, and tasted nothing like chocolate.)

The “nurses” that were there to oversee the distribution looked stern and formidable. I doubt they were County Health Nurses. Most likely, Feds.


67 posted on 11/25/2007 8:08:26 AM PST by Monkey Face (If we are what we eat, I'm cheap, fast and easy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

68 posted on 11/25/2007 9:36:48 AM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

“Not the tank armor.”

I mean the enemy tank armor. If they spend a million dollars in a publicity campaign to make us stop using it, demoralize the troops, and turn the citizens against the government, it’s cheaper than re-engineering their tank armor.

The impact point of the sabot round has U vapor and dust, not the launch point.


69 posted on 11/25/2007 10:24:05 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

“And do you remember when they had fluoroscopes in shoe stores?”

I’ve heard of them, and seen one in a museum.

It was an unfiltered x-ray tube, too, with loads of low energy photons.

In the 30’s someone was selling a ceramic cylinder loaded with thorium, you were supposed to put it in your drinking water pitcher to “energize” the water and make you healthy!


70 posted on 11/25/2007 10:27:14 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EBH; rellimpank

Flying in mid-latitudes over 23K feet can give you about .3 mR/hour in non-flare conditions. During a solar flare it goes up, and it goes up with altitude and latitude. In most places, the normal ground level background is 20 micro-R, so 300 uR is significant.

Above 34K feet, there are loads of neutrons, and some mesons too, from cosmic ray primary collisions. Now that memory cells and processor cells are so small, there is work being done to investigate “neutron single-event upset”, where high altitude neutrons mes up the function of some electronics.

In the EU, pilots and attendants are considered to be radiation workers and are given dosimeter badges.

And we are told that it’s the baggage x-ray that ruins your film you shot in Paris, then flew home on a polar route!


71 posted on 11/25/2007 10:37:59 AM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
Radioactivity ain’t fun. Just ask the Russian children born with no legs and three arms near Chernobyl.

Birth defects have existed since the dawn of humanity. The main health result of Chernobyl has been a grim, fatalistic outlook on life.

The influence of the post-Chernobyl fallout on birth defects and abortion rates in Austria.

RESULTS: No significant changes in the incidence of birth defects, abortion rate, or counseling rate at pregnancy termination clinics were observed.

72 posted on 11/25/2007 1:57:22 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: riored
Those were depleted uranium rounds. Heavy metals whether radioactive or not, are toxic, and when a high velocity round like the 30mm the A10 fires or the sabot round a tank fires hits a hard target, some of the round will heat up, vaporize burn etc so you have this heavy metal dust that makes it much easier for the body to ingest.

It would be similar if they used tungsten instead of uranium.

73 posted on 11/25/2007 3:42:28 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mvpel

The problem is the accident didn’t occur in Austria. It occured in the Ukraine. Belarus is said to have been exposed to 70% of the radiation. Russia was also heavily radiated. The radiation released was estimated to be 200 times the combined radiation release of both atomic bombs dropped on Japan. The rate of thyroid cancer Gomel Oblast, Belarus has increased two hundred fold for children under 15 year old. That’s damning evidence of the dangers of radiation since healthy 15 year olds don’t develop cancer unless there is an external cause. One thing should be noted, though, Chernobyl didn’t have a containment structure and Chernobyl’s design was unstable to begin with, requiring no heavy water and graphite for moderation. They didn’t even have to use enriched urainium. So for those who are pushing nuclear power, I say fine. With the right configuration, we might never see an accident again. But as far as underestimating radiation exposure, I think that’s just stupid.


74 posted on 11/25/2007 3:49:25 PM PST by TheThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ko_kyi

You are correct, DU sluggs are and alpha emitter. We wore gloves, dust masks and had the DR guys run a counter over us at the end of the day - worst day - we had to take a hose to our uniforms. Within 30 min we were bone dry - and feeling better, it had been kinda hot that day.

The targets (T55s) were also secondary alpha emitters as IIRC, they had been used in some of the open air testing from back in the day.

FWIW, the DU slugs completely ripped the Soviet era armor to shreds.


75 posted on 11/25/2007 5:16:02 PM PST by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie
And do you remember when they had fluoroscopes in shoe stores?

Used to put my feet in them and watch my toes wiggle -- just unshielded x-ray machines...

76 posted on 11/25/2007 7:20:53 PM PST by GOPJ (Hillary "tricky Dick" Nixon/Clinton. - Stiff a waitress - lie about it. Plant questions - lie more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

“The rate of thyroid cancer Gomel Oblast, Belarus has increased two hundred fold for children under 15 year old.”

That’s interesting- is it the cesium that is suspected, or some other isotope?

Do you have a link or citation for the source? I’d like to read it.


77 posted on 11/25/2007 7:52:58 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

“But as far as underestimating radiation exposure, I think that’s just stupid.”

Look up the BIER reports, they have the best estimates so far of risk vs dose.


78 posted on 11/25/2007 7:54:25 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
Are we talking about thyroid cancer, or birth defects? Thyroid problems are a result of the uptake of radioactive iodine, which is a fission product, into the thyroid gland.

In the Ukraine, however, there's a lot of other possible causes of birth defects:

Pollutants by virtually unregulated industrial sources violate air quality regulations in at least 18 of 52 Ukrainian cities.2 Raw waste water on the order of 1 million cubic meters is dumped into the environment annually. Heavy industries associated with ore processing, chemical works, and the military, produced and continue to produce vast amounts of waste which are dumped untreated in landfills. ... Deteriorated water supplies, lack of access to vitamins, iodized salt and other micro-nutrients such as folic acid, which are essential for normal embryonal development, compound public awareness of reproductive risks in Ukraine.

So are they going to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on a slightly-elevated background radiation problem, while industrial pollution goes on unabated? The Chisso Corporation in Minimata Japan had absolutely nothing to do with radioactive elements from 1925 onward.

79 posted on 11/26/2007 6:06:03 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I can remember a scientist saying you could eat either urainium or plutonium and no get sick, it is just when it is highly refined that it becomes dangerous.


80 posted on 11/26/2007 6:08:02 AM PST by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson