[SoCalPol]

The economic republicans are no better than the far left anti war.

Hunter’s record re military and national security along with dealing with the issues of illegals for decades are the main issue facing us starting with the war.

BTW Hunter’s son just got home the other day from his third tour in the war.

If your home is buring down are you going to call your stock broker or the fire dept.

I don’t care what any candidate thinks on economics.
If we don’t win this war, no money, constitution, etc. will mean nothing.

[cripplecreek]

At this point the integrity of the nation is far more important than anything else.

[CitizenUSA]

SoCalPol wrote: “If we don’t win this war, no money, constitution, etc. will mean nothing.”

Yet even Guiliani seems to be strong on the war. Isn’t is possible to accomplish more, as in economic and constitution-related issues?

[RockinRight]

Of course.

But there are candidates out there that are just as strong on the WOT that won’t turn our economy into a 1600s serf/sustinence economy in the process.

Fred Thompson comes to mind.

[from occupied ga]

If we don’t win this war, no money, constitution, etc. will mean nothing.

I heard the same lies about Viet Nam in the '70's turned out it was BS then too.

[AuntB]

See post 203. The Club for Growth was founded and is run by the biggest open border globalists around.