Skip to comments.
Iraq war is hell on the bottom line at the box office
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| November 23, 2007
| Joe Garofoli
Posted on 11/24/2007 4:44:20 PM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
Jabbar Magruder is an active duty Army National Guard sergeant who served 11 months in Iraq. He was hoping that stateside Americans would get a glimpse of what the war was like when several dramas featuring the Iraq conflict either in the foreground or the background hit theaters this fall.
Snip.
But to some Iraq veterans, like Magruder, who have tried to raise awareness about the war's perils, the apathy represents a larger disconnect many Americans feel toward the war. Implicit in the Redford, Streep and Tom Cruise film "Lions for Lambs" is a challenge to filmgoers to become impassioned about the war.
Snip.
"I thought that with the casts (of these films), at least a portion of America would go to see them," said Magruder, a 24-year-old who is taking premed classes at California State University Northridge and is the Los Angeles chapter president of Iraq Veterans Against the War. Like many soldiers, he joined the service out of a sense of duty and, because his family had limited financial means, to pay for college.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: boxoffice; hollywood; leftistidiots; redacted
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
If the Los Angeles chapter president of Iraq Veterans Against the War isn't a good source for reporters writing about veteran opinion on the subject of Iraq then I don't know who is. Unless perhaps it's one of the half million or so veterans who aren't part of that organization. But I guess this reporter couldn't find any of them.
To: Homer_J_Simpson
The MSM wouldn't know the meaning of patriotism if it chomped them on their rear end.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2
posted on
11/24/2007 4:45:41 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Homer_J_Simpson
3
posted on
11/24/2007 4:46:15 PM PST
by
redstateconfidential
(If you are the smartest person in the room,you are hanging out with the wrong people.)
To: Homer_J_Simpson
Hollywood does not get it. Americans do not to see anti USA movies that make our military look like war criminals. Plus that is not what we are. If they would bring out some movies that make our soldiers look like heroes, then maybe people would go see them.
4
posted on
11/24/2007 4:48:20 PM PST
by
Uncle Hal
To: Homer_J_Simpson
*sputter*
I can’t believe this tripe. Gee... maybe the films failure has to do with apathy towards the moonbat leftist line???
5
posted on
11/24/2007 4:48:24 PM PST
by
bolobaby
To: Homer_J_Simpson
If Hollywood instead of Hollywierd would produce a film that was about the soldiers, their heroics, and their big hearts, rather than the rehashed Vietnam Anti-War trash; it would be different.
Unfortunately we don’t have Hollywood any longer only Hollywierd.
6
posted on
11/24/2007 4:49:40 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: bolobaby
And the movies are just bad ones, to boot?
7
posted on
11/24/2007 4:50:39 PM PST
by
Clara Lou
(Thompson '08)
To: Homer_J_Simpson
Iraq War on America's Warriors is hell on the bottom line
at the box office
This "Truth in Journalism" correction provided free of charge to
Free Republic.
8
posted on
11/24/2007 4:51:12 PM PST
by
VOA
To: Homer_J_Simpson
Hollywood has no credibility these days. The public wants entertainment, but Hollywood portrays it as history, or perhaps opinion. It certainly doesn’t pass as entertainment these days.
9
posted on
11/24/2007 4:51:35 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: Homer_J_Simpson
But to some Iraq veterans, like Magruder, who have tried to raise awareness about the war's perils, the apathy represents a larger disconnect many Americans feel toward the war. Implicit in the Redford, Streep and Tom Cruise film "Lions for Lambs" is a challenge to filmgoers to become impassioned about the war.A larger disconnect??? Please, maybe people are just tired of the Hollywood hype. Come on! Give us a break from these idiots.
To: redstateconfidential
That’s an interesting name isn’t it.
11
posted on
11/24/2007 4:52:25 PM PST
by
rdl6989
To: Homer_J_Simpson
Yet more enemy propaganda from the pervert filth traitors of the LA Slimes. They’d burst into flames if ever forced to tell the truth.
12
posted on
11/24/2007 4:53:20 PM PST
by
DGHoodini
(The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
To: Homer_J_Simpson
Tell you what, Hollywood, you put out a film that documents the incredible roll-over of the Iraqi army, the creativity in bringing amphibious vehicles through the desert to cross the Tigeres river and surprise Republican Guard units, and ends with the Iraqi people cheering as the statue of Saddam is toppled, I’ll pull out my fifteen bucks and go see it.
We can’t lose a war we won /long/ ago.
13
posted on
11/24/2007 4:53:46 PM PST
by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: Homer_J_Simpson
In another great example of reality being greater than fiction, The Surge is working on two fronts: Not only is it making ho-wood's anti-war fantasies look ridiculous, but it's also making believers out of Iraqi refugees who are finally returning home:
100,000s of Iraqis Enthusiastically Return Home.
14
posted on
11/24/2007 4:53:54 PM PST
by
Vision Thing
(hillary is unstable)
To: DGHoodini
OOoops! Meant SF Chronicholes.
15
posted on
11/24/2007 4:54:54 PM PST
by
DGHoodini
(The Dems no longer have the humanity to grasp that there are things worth dying for.)
To: redstateconfidential
“Jabbar?”
Well, maybe his folks just couldn’t find a name in the Bible or whithin the Greco-Roman-European area that suited him.
To: Homer_J_Simpson
Wahoo! Let’s hear it for the sound of hollywood whinos being flushed down the toilet where they belong.
17
posted on
11/24/2007 4:59:20 PM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: Homer_J_Simpson
...a challenge to filmgoers to become impassioned about the war. I'm not sure I want to be sitting in the middle of a theater full of "impassioned" viewers.
18
posted on
11/24/2007 5:01:42 PM PST
by
The Duke
(I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
To: Uncle Hal
Hollywood does not get it.
Oh they get it. With all due respect,people who say they don't get it are the ones who don't get it. Many Hollywood types and like minded people don't think of themselves as Americans. They consider themselves socialists. it is paramount for them to attempt any means possible, including trying to demoralize our military, to replace our democratic form of government with a strong centralized socialist form.
19
posted on
11/24/2007 5:01:50 PM PST
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! Duncan Hunter is a Cosponsor.)
To: nkycincinnatikid
What about that Bruice Willis Movie he can’t get anyone to make because it show US troops as heroes rather than wacked out murderous nut jobs? Make that movie and see if people come. Maybe Hollyweird needs a 9-11 to happen on Melrose Drive before they will start to see red, white and blue again.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson