Hard for me to work up any sympathy for this guy.
Mental Picture of this guys brain: Frayed electrical wires, sparks, smoke, goo.
Goldi Locks could make a decision quicker than Bruhns.
Hey Bruhns, check the newswires. The surge is working. Peace is coming to Iraq. Vote Republican.
It is neither. All the wishing in Bruhns' world won't change that.
“.......I saw the damage done to our country for most of the last seven years with the Republicans in control of the executive, legislative and judicial branches. There was no political balance whatsoever to keep our democracy pure......”
He complains that the anti war idiots are too anti Bush then in the end he complains about those evil Republicans...
Follow Bush to the gates of hell? Republican unity? This guy really does have a hard time seeing reality. It's no wonder he was a useful idiot for the left. I wonder whose b*tch he is now.
Often is is politically motivated, they use it as a character assasination and a way to hate on the "evil right."... instead of being genuinely opposed to this kind of war.
Remember when Clinton's war was going on? I don't remember the same amount of anti-war protests from the left then. So, the writer does have a point that the movement from the left is not always sincere.
I’m glad he finally figured out that he was being played like a cheap fiddle. Hopefully he will sit down and examine all of his own talking points.
My best bud was a retired Marine Officer... he said 10% of ALL that are in the Military should be put against the wall and shot... you found one here!
LLS
I’m reminded of the young marine that stood up with his mommy at the last Democratic debates in Las Vegas.
He was wearing his “Operation Iraq Freedom” hat, but crying about the war and having to go overseas.
If he’s so ashamed of the war, then why was he wearing his OIF hat? Either it’s something to be proud of or it isn’t.
And having his mommy hold his hand was just pathetic.
First, I thank the writer for his service.
However, the writer is evidently ignorant of the fact that we don't live in a democracy. We have a republic - if we can keep it.
Finally, the author insists he was dishonest when he first walked away from the agitator groups, but is being honest now. When someone admits to lying, which part is the lie? The original, or the mea culpa?