Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House wants to sell JDAMs to the Saudis
The Hill ^ | November 20, 2007

Posted on 11/20/2007 7:25:38 AM PST by ddtorquee

House members from both parties are calling on the Bush administration to delay a $20 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia and to impose tougher restrictions on how the Middle Eastern country could use the weaponry.

Last week, the Bush administration informally notified Congress of its intention to sell high-technology armaments, including satellite-guided munitions and naval vessels, to Saudi Arabia, which is a key ally in the region. Lawmakers have protested the sale since news first leaked of negotiations in late July.

“The idea that we are going to reward the Saudis with precision weaponry is a stunningly bad idea, and clearly deserves the full review of Congress,” said Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) in a press release.

...another bipartisan group of House members called for stricter guidelines on how Saudi Arabia could use the U.S.-sold weapons. Reps. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Chris Carney (D-Pa.) and 186 other lawmakers expressed “serious concerns” over selling Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) technology — highly accurate precision arms — to the Saudis.

“If it falls into the wrong hands, JDAM technology could significantly harm U.S. forces in the region and undercut Israel’s qualitative military edge,” the letter states.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: congress; jdams; ropbushsfriends; saudiarabia; weaponssales; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Dr. Thorne

We tried this kind of policy with Iran and the Shah. Do we want a Khomeini style leader/government in Saudi Arabia?


21 posted on 11/20/2007 8:17:01 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

LOL


22 posted on 11/20/2007 8:20:30 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA
Saudi Arabia and Israel fighting as brothers?

Dogs and cats living together...mass hysteria...

23 posted on 11/20/2007 8:21:59 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA

.......Saudi Arabia and Israel fighting as brothers....

No, more like enlightened distant cousins with a common enemy more threatening than each other. For the Gulf to prosper the threat of Iran must be eliminated.

In a world where commercial interests rule, Israel and Iraq would become members of the Gulf Cooperation Council and part of a great trade engine. Since religion seems to have the upper hand, it may be some time before that happens. Meantime, Iran must not control the Two Holy mosques and the mosque in Jerusalem.

The war in Iraq is the first stage of the reconcilliation.


24 posted on 11/20/2007 8:25:07 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ddtorquee

Only if they are delivered one at a time from some altitude.


25 posted on 11/20/2007 8:29:29 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than to have to fight them OVER HERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
Hey, it's not like the Saudis allowed us to use their airbases for 12 years after Gulf War I to maintain patrols of the Iraqi Northern and Southern No-Fly Zones, or allowed us to stage air strkes from their soil during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Oh wait...

26 posted on 11/20/2007 8:30:30 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: kabar

See post #6. The difference between the mullahs and the royal family is subtle.


28 posted on 11/20/2007 8:40:43 AM PST by Dr. Thorne (Compromise on your vote and you get a compromised government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne

Saudi Arabia, Wahhabism and the Spread of Sunni Theofascism
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1925860/posts


29 posted on 11/20/2007 8:51:23 AM PST by ddtorquee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

iran


30 posted on 11/20/2007 8:57:44 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ddtorquee

Well, we sell arms to Pakistan and India...?


31 posted on 11/20/2007 8:59:48 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Thorne
See my post #20

See post #6. The difference between the mullahs and the royal family is subtle.

It is so subtle as to be laughable. As someone who spent five years in Saudi Arabia [1987-92] working for the USG, the points listed in post #6 are not only silly, but they confuse the Saudi Government with the actions of some of its citizens. UBL wants to remove the Royal Family from power and AQ in Saudi Arabia has launched a number of attacks against the government, infrastructure, and foreigners, including attacking our consulate in Jeddah.

Saudi Arabia is the home of two of the three holiest sites in Islam. There is a reason why the King is called the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques. The USG has called for more religious freedom and improved treatment of women as part of our human rights policy, which is spelled out in the annual Human Rights Report for Saudi Arabia published by the State Department.

The Saudis have been helpful in a number of ways, operating on our behalf without being publicly known. They have also helped stablize world oil supplies and prices by using their excess capacity to address shortfalls and moderate prices. They are the world's largest source of exportable oil and have the world's largest proven oil reserves. Our own national strategic interests require us to maintain good diplomatic relations with the Saudis. And I would rather have them purchase weapons from us than the Russians or Chinese.

32 posted on 11/20/2007 9:00:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: dfwgator

I suspect there is a reason behind whatever reason we may learn or try to guess.

When we hit Iran, that entire region is going to be involved.

With our need for oil, it seems better to have them in our tent pi$$ing out than out pi$$ing in.

Besides, if we don’t sell the junk to them, they will buy it outside of our control and interests.


34 posted on 11/20/2007 9:12:11 AM PST by Gator113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ddtorquee

WHY are we selling this stuff to the Saudis?? Have we gone insane?

And what’s weirder is that it was a DEMOCRAT who condemned the action. Things are getting very strange...


35 posted on 11/20/2007 9:15:07 AM PST by G8 Diplomat (Creatures are divided into 6 kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Monera, Protista, & Saudi Arabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ddtorquee

Pump enough oil so that the price goes to $50 a barrel and we’ll talk.


36 posted on 11/20/2007 9:32:38 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Yaeh, they’re just great. Sounds like you’ve chosen your side.


37 posted on 11/20/2007 9:47:33 AM PST by Dr. Thorne (Compromise on your vote and you get a compromised government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
OMG I actually agree with a Democrat, what's the world coming to?

And a Yankee one at that.

38 posted on 11/20/2007 9:50:06 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Only if they are delivered one at a time from some altitude.

Or if we can detonate them remotely.

39 posted on 11/20/2007 9:55:58 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“House members from both parties are calling on the Bush administration to delay a $20 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia”

The slope to hell has just taken a turn for the worst. Gotta love your political hero’s. Bush will sign, whatta guy!


40 posted on 11/20/2007 10:02:19 AM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson