Posted on 11/19/2007 4:30:05 PM PST by jdm
Sounds like typical CNN BS to me.
Link to today's 26-page New Hampshire poll report (PDF).

Sorry, way too many so-called conservatives want the feds to give them their way on issues, rather than federalism. I can believe these numbers. Easily. More is the pity.
Let’s just take abortion for one. I’ve had people here say the Constitution or the 14th Amendment already protect unborn persons. This is bunk. The federalist position, which Fred has adopted, is that abortion is a state issue, short of a change in our Constitution. I happen to agree with this approach. Plenty of social conservatives want their way and are willing to throw out the Constitution to get it.
These results simply do not pass the smell test. Something is bogus.
Perhaps, but that doesn’t make this poll valid.
Fred just scares the sh!t out of them...
Where’s that Hunter fellar on this poll? He apparently was’t even important enough to be a line on the poll..... reckon?
This is why small insignificant New England states shouldn’t be the first to open ther polls. They sway far too much opinion for the insignificant electoral votes they represent. Essentially their primaries are a ho hum event, but the media plays up their importance beyond reason.
Fred is the least of the people running that would get a not support “under any circumstance” if you ask me.
Hunter wasn’t even an option!
***That ought to tell you something. But if you’re a Fred supporter who worships name recognition, it will go right over your head.
I would say that most of them don't want to throw out the Constitution, they want to amend it to state that unborn children are fully human. Nothing at all wrong that.
If I was a betting person, I would bet pissant is unbanned at some point (after a week or two in timeout?). Just a guess.
reply on post #28
Must be made up! The “Never Vote For” line for Ron Paul is 61%, and we all KNOW that Ron Paul is going to win everything... /sarc
That ought to tell you something.It sure does. It tells me he's not even a contender.
I have to admit. Those are ugly numbers for Fred. Cut them by a third and they’re still ugly.
“Looks like CNN is pulling for a McCain/Hillary match-up.”
Funny, I see a Hillary/McCain ticket. LOL
I'm betting you would be wrong, I liked Pissant but this relentless craping on other candidates (Not that he didn't do that also)rather than just pushing his was old long ago.
Me thinks JimRob has had enough.
The poll shows fear of rising support for Duncan Hunter.
Yours is the sort of opportunistic bashing that gives Hunter (supporters) a bad name.
***And Fred’s followers are getting more shrill, it’s a sign of fear.
Knock it off.
***I’ve only been logging onto the the following:
1) immigration threads — because Hunter criticized Thompson on immigration
Road to Des Moines Conversions on Immigration (Hunter Press release)
News Which Cannot Lose ^ | 10/25/07 | Duncan Hunter/staff
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1916889/posts
2) Hunter losing traciton in polls threads
3) Prolife threads, where I barely even criticize Thompson because he has a prolife record
4) A few other scattered threads.
The thread is about FDTs numbers (in one poll) in NH;
***Then it is one of the threads I intend to log onto and show how Fred is not a good campaigner. The data at Intrade shows it.
Thompson’s campaign is showing signs of imploding.
Who would be the unbiased indicator for that, Fred Supporters or Futures Markets? If you have better unbiased data, let me see it.
.
.
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
Posted on 11/15/2007 3:43:17 AM PST by Kevmo
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.