Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Josh Painter
Excellent point.

The liberals have gotten themselves where they are today through incrementalism.

Thompson's federalist approach is constitutionally sound, and it would probably save more babies faster than trying to get a constitutional amendment through -- which can take years and years, even in the best of circumstances, and if opposed by a political faction it may take forever.

So (especially given his 100% voting record) it seems to me that calling Thompson's position pro-abortion is not just a stretch, it's an outright lie.

2 posted on 11/18/2007 5:32:18 PM PST by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanMother

“probably save more babies faster”
Excellent point.


3 posted on 11/18/2007 5:34:00 PM PST by dynachrome (Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanMother

“So (especially given his 100% voting record) it seems to me that calling Thompson’s position pro-abortion is not just a stretch, it’s an outright lie.”

quite a twist of logic there


4 posted on 11/18/2007 5:38:00 PM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanMother; Josh Painter

Returning the abortion issue to the states is actually a good idea because the states have an important role to play in the amendment process. Any amendment must be ratified by three fourths of the state legislatures before it becomes law.


8 posted on 11/18/2007 6:16:11 PM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanMother

“Thompson’s federalist approach is constitutionally sound, and it would probably save more babies faster than trying to get a constitutional amendment through”

I believe Thompson is not against a Constitutional amendment, per se. I think the kind of amendment that he would support would remove abortion from federal jurisdiction, while it want not, on its own, make federal “pro-life” mandate. I agree with that approach, from a constitutional and federalist perspective and I believe that social conservatives, primarily protestant and Catholic Christians, would achieve many gains (against abortion on demand), in the states, if federal courts, and particularly the supreme court could not intervene. I think an amendment that simply ends that intervention would serve everyone well.


12 posted on 11/18/2007 6:47:54 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: jellybean; Politicalmom; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; ...
PING!!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference

WARNING: If you wish to join, be aware that this ping list is EXTREMELY active.

27 posted on 11/18/2007 8:21:38 PM PST by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanMother
So (especially given his 100% voting record) it seems to me that calling Thompson's position pro-abortion is not just a stretch, it's an outright lie.

Exactly!

39 posted on 11/18/2007 10:19:13 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson