Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AnAmericanMother

“Thompson’s federalist approach is constitutionally sound, and it would probably save more babies faster than trying to get a constitutional amendment through”

I believe Thompson is not against a Constitutional amendment, per se. I think the kind of amendment that he would support would remove abortion from federal jurisdiction, while it want not, on its own, make federal “pro-life” mandate. I agree with that approach, from a constitutional and federalist perspective and I believe that social conservatives, primarily protestant and Catholic Christians, would achieve many gains (against abortion on demand), in the states, if federal courts, and particularly the supreme court could not intervene. I think an amendment that simply ends that intervention would serve everyone well.


12 posted on 11/18/2007 6:47:54 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

I agree.

Anyone willing to look at the 10th Amendment should agree that abortion should never have been a federal issue in the first place.


13 posted on 11/18/2007 7:00:46 PM PST by guinnessman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson