There are others, of course, and they are far worse. But the double standard is what I'm pointing to here not necessarily the content.
I also recent Pissant's ban because, being a 'bit' paranoid and with good instincts proven thorough the years I might add, I smell a rat here.
I've seen the boys on the other side dish it out, and they can be vicious too, in their 'sophisticated' ways, but they can be ruthless in getting their points across all right. Some how they look like 'altar-boys.'on this one :). I never thought of Pissant being in the same group, but let's s say that he broke some rules.
IF Pissant has been legitimately banned for breaking some rules, he should be back in couple of weeks and that will be the end of that.
IF ON THE OTHER HAND, this whole thing has been engineered to ban him permanently in other to protect their chosen one Mr Fred Thomson, then the ban should go over for a much longer time like.. after the elections?.... If the ban goes too long it means they fear Pissant's leadership determination and commitment to a candidate of much better quality as Duncan is. The whole idea I would suspect is to shut Duncan down the competition... or at least keep it quiet and nice... real quiet... so that all our attention, and hopefully influence outside opinion as well as to who the only messiah of conservatives is.
I suspect a silent agreement has been made in FR already that Fred is their boy. I also believe that they expected the heavens to open with all the pump and circumstance due a new messiah descending to upon earth once again. It hasn't happened and it will not happen. Politicians must be of the utmost character to be believed by us and I don't know Fred that well other than he is a Hollywood actor and had a career in politics with no apparent distinction as I understand it. He may say all the right things, and throw a bone here and there to social-conservatives, but we'll have to see a lot more before we abandon Duncan.