To: Sub-Driver
So what is the left saying? That CNN is guilty of bias?
Noooooooo. Can’t be.
2 posted on
11/17/2007 8:16:54 AM PST by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: Sub-Driver
Another criticism of Hillary! from the New York Fishwrap? What the hell is happening to the world?????
3 posted on
11/17/2007 8:17:02 AM PST by
pabianice
To: Sub-Driver
They called it a conflict of interest I'm amazed they even know what that phrase means.
To: Sub-Driver
So this means Shrillary is still in free fall. I love it. And from her own “people,” the lag dogs at the New York Times. Or have they switched to Obama?
To: Sub-Driver
If WoofWoof can't make it for the next Demo "infomercial" is suggest this man as the "moderator".
![](http://www.smartmoney.com/mymoney/images/ron_pic.jpg)
To: Sub-Driver
We need a pool for her inevitable melt down.
9 posted on
11/17/2007 8:23:49 AM PST by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: Sub-Driver
Wolfe Blitzer was specifically and publicly warned by the Clinton campaign not to run the debate in the style of Tim Russert. He and CNN took the warning seriously and turned the debate into a Clinton campaign event.
10 posted on
11/17/2007 8:25:47 AM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: Sub-Driver
When I heard Carville’s voice that night I thought the exact same thing....
ie....Carville is the guy who said if you drag a dollar through a trailer park....re Paula Jones....
If that isn’t an obvious attachment to the Clintons I don’t know what is.
I shrugged it off but knew that if CNN were doing a Republican debate and trotted out Karl Rove as a commentator it would be blasted from here to kingdom come.
You mean others notice it too?
11 posted on
11/17/2007 8:25:55 AM PST by
Fishtalk
(http://patfish.blogspot.com)
To: Sub-Driver; All
Think about this for a second, folks...
If CNN was willing to LIE for Saddam, just IMAGINE what these people are willing to do for Hillary?
12 posted on
11/17/2007 8:30:18 AM PST by
tcrlaf
(You can lead a Liberal to LOGIC, but you can't make it THINK)
To: Sub-Driver
Carville was there as a reminder to Team Blitzer that that warning earlier in the week [about not pulling another Russert] was still valid.
The debate had one major purpose: To rehabilitate Hillary from the disaster of the driver’s licenses, etc., during the previous debate.
It did that.
13 posted on
11/17/2007 8:34:53 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: Sub-Driver
I am having fun reading this article. The socialists are beating up on each other!
14 posted on
11/17/2007 8:36:16 AM PST by
OneHun
To: Sub-Driver
A CNN executive conceded that the cable channel should have more fully disclosed Mr. Carvilles past and that it was discussing how to handle such situations. What they are saying is that they will continue to be involved in this biased type of situation and are discussing how to disclose it with minimal impact on their agenda.
15 posted on
11/17/2007 8:36:53 AM PST by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Sub-Driver
Liberals get to “re-examine.” Conservatives must resign.
17 posted on
11/17/2007 8:38:54 AM PST by
Steely Tom
(Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
To: Sub-Driver
"
A CNN executive conceded that the cable channel should have more fully disclosed Mr. Carvilles past and that it was discussing how to handle such situations."
Maybe they could simply insert a box under the picture that 'fully discloses' CNN's liberal bias?
That would cover all the socialist talking heads and 'news makers' equally.
20 posted on
11/17/2007 8:41:09 AM PST by
norton
(Go ahead, vote for Hunter, you know you want to.)
To: Sub-Driver
The hell with disclosure, they never should have invited present or former Clintonistas to be post-debate pundits.
23 posted on
11/17/2007 8:57:25 AM PST by
freespirited
(I'm voting for the GOP nominee.)
To: Sub-Driver
Apparently the only commentators CNN staffs itself with are Clinton supporters and fellow leftists.
No wonder they have a problem getting neutral pundits on the air.
25 posted on
11/17/2007 9:18:25 AM PST by
wildbill
To: Sub-Driver
Well, interesting that they said this much. But they suppressed quite a bit. They forgot to mention that Maria Luisa got into a snit and let slip that ALL the questions were pre-planned, not just hers.
Also, they seem to think that it would be OK for CNN to stack the interviewers and commentators across the board with known clintonoid spinmeisters, as long as they disclose it in a brief aside.
That’s not my idea of a DEBATE.
27 posted on
11/17/2007 10:49:14 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson