Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
The Navy also admits there was a training exercise in the TWA 800 vacinity on the night of the TWA 800 incident.

The one thing that bothers this pilot is that the "official" explaination of what brought TWA800 down is that jet fuel vapors exploded in the center fuel tank. Jet fuel is essentially kerosene and the vapors are not at all explosive unless they are compressed. That's what a jet engine is, a big compressor. It's hard enough to get jet fuel to burn at sea level, much less get the vapors to burn explosively at somewhere between 12,000-17,000' agl. That one has never been explained satisfactorily, regardless of what anyone thinks was the cause of the crash. They always tapdance around that little ditty......

28 posted on 11/17/2007 4:40:22 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Thinking of voting Democrat? Wake up and smell the Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Thermalseeker

“Mythbusters” recreated this incident exactly. In fact, they got a MORE powerful explosion using a wire spark and fuel tank vapors heated to the levels present in TWA 800.


41 posted on 11/17/2007 7:35:27 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Thermalseeker

What I found amusing was that they tried to play up the heat that day and that the plane had to stand still with it’s air conditioning unit on, as if the heat buildup were somethng significant. These aircraft fly in and out of the Middle-East constantly with no problem at all.

Then there’s the wiring issue, that to this day still hasn’t cost another aircraft it’s existance ten years farther along in the life cycle.

Some folks claim that there have been other fuel tank problems, but they are very very far and few between and I’m not sold on their actual cause of loss either.


56 posted on 11/17/2007 1:38:11 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Thermalseeker

I should have addressed your comments. Sorry about that. I believe your reasoning is quite solid on those points.


57 posted on 11/17/2007 1:39:14 PM PST by DoughtyOne (California, where the death penalty is reserved for wholesome values. SB 777)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Thermalseeker

Actually, the Discovery Channel re-created such an accident. The fuel tank exploded pretty dramatically. After that, I began to think TWA800 was probably not a terrorist incident, though it is still a slight possibility. But an accidental naval shoot down is hardly even a possibility.


70 posted on 11/17/2007 2:31:56 PM PST by attiladhun2 (Islam is a despotism so vile that it would warm the heart of Orwell's Big Brother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Thermalseeker

“The one thing that bothers this pilot is that the “official” explaination of what brought TWA800 down is that jet fuel vapors exploded in the center fuel tank. Jet fuel is essentially kerosene and the vapors are not at all explosive unless they are compressed. That’s what a jet engine is, a big compressor. It’s hard enough to get jet fuel to burn at sea level, much less get the vapors to burn explosively at somewhere between 12,000-17,000’ agl. That one has never been explained satisfactorily, regardless of what anyone thinks was the cause of the crash. They always tapdance around that little ditty......”

I agree and if it were an “exploding fuel tank” airliners would be dropping like flies wouldn’t they?


182 posted on 11/26/2007 2:16:53 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (A vote for ron paul in the primary IS a vote for hillary clinton in the general election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson