To: rightinthemiddle
Whenever Government appears to endorse religion over nonreligion, we should be wearyI'm already "weary" of this piece just after reading the excerpt. Clearly the guy doesn't have an editor. But why should government endorse "nonreligion" over religion? Isn't that also a "violation" of the establishment clause?
To: The Old Hoosier
Exactly. Non-religion is the state religion.
8 posted on
11/13/2007 11:17:05 AM PST by
jwalburg
(Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. What does that say about schools?)
To: The Old Hoosier
But why should government endorse "nonreligion" over religion?Shouldn't, particularly since history has shown that societies where government formally endorses non-religion over religion get dismal real-world results.
To: The Old Hoosier
“I’m already “weary” of this piece just after reading the excerpt. Clearly the guy doesn’t have an editor. But why should government endorse “nonreligion” over religion? Isn’t that also a “violation” of the establishment clause?”
Well said.
I am wary of the implication that atheism should be endorsed over religion.
36 posted on
11/16/2007 5:01:06 AM PST by
ChessExpert
(Reagan dismantled the Russian empire of 21 conquered nations)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson