Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Don't Want a Fire In The Belly!!!
11/13/2007 | Me

Posted on 11/13/2007 9:55:44 AM PST by Rita Hayworth

I DON'T WANT A FIRE IN THE BELLY!!

So what if Fred Thompson isn't every where at every moment.

Who cares that being the US President hasn't been his lifelong dream?

So he isn't doing back flips or some other idiotic stunt to get attention.

Where has that gotten us before?

Well.... Bill Clinton has the fire since he was a little boy. We all know how that turned out.

Saddam, Chavez, Quadafy, and even Hitler were brimming with Belly Fire.

I want a man who will keep my country safe, who will have a responsible stewardship of the economy, and protect the Constitution and States Rights.

I want a Statesman. I want a leader. I don't want someone who has to be all things to all people.

We all know the fable of the tortoise and the hare. Well I want a tortoise. I want slow and steady.

I don't want Las Vegas in the White House. We had enough of that garbage in the 90s. Give me a man who stands by his word and can stand up to Nasty Nancy and Harry Reid and the rest of the nutjobs who think that they can run a war better than the generals.

Ok, that's enough for now. I am not a good writer and not very eloquent but I think that I have common sense.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bellyfire; fredthompson; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: mnehrling
Very true, and important. I should have substituted removal from office for impeachment.

Removal of Clinton would have gotten us Gore for 9-11.

61 posted on 11/13/2007 10:59:33 AM PST by Rita Hayworth (Vote for a guy who had 399 House Bank overdrafts totaling $129,000? Yeah right!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; pitbully; ...
I am not a good writer and not very eloquent but I think that I have common sense.

I think you're very elequent and supporting Fred speaks of your common sense!!!!! (I threw in a couple of extra !!'s just to annoy the gnats :) )


62 posted on 11/13/2007 11:00:39 AM PST by jellybean (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=dailyfread Proud Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Sorry, but voting for the lesser of two evils just doesn't cut it any more. Conservatives are pretty well fed up with the garbage the republicans have presented the voters in the last few elections. First the Reagan Democrats dropped their support of republican candidates...expect the same of conservatives if the party keeps putting up RINOs. REMEMBER...A VOTE FOR A RINO IS A VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT.
63 posted on 11/13/2007 11:02:04 AM PST by A_Tradition_Continues (THE NEXT GENERATION CONSERVATIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I was sure that’s what you meant.


64 posted on 11/13/2007 11:04:06 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (NY Times: "fake but accurate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Post 49 has the full committee report - really incredible stuff. Read what the Senators who voted not to convict say at the end!

Here's another link to more recent comments by Fred that gives you the quick answer - he did vote to convict on the obstruction charge (and we only needed one) but didn't feel the perjury charge fit the Founders definition of impeachable:

On Bill Clinton's impeachment, Hannity asked: Why did you vote against conviction? From Thompson: I split my vote according to what I believed to be my duty. I voted to convict on obstruction of justice, and not to convict on charges of perjury. I went back to the Founder's intent and believe they did not consider this an impeachable offense.

Fred on Hannity

65 posted on 11/13/2007 11:04:58 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

I agree. I’m for a Polkian president for a change. Get in, fix a lot of things, seek no second term.


66 posted on 11/13/2007 11:07:41 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

Well done, Miss Hayworth!


67 posted on 11/13/2007 11:08:16 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Ah, thanks. I can’t believe I missed the Hannity interview.


68 posted on 11/13/2007 11:10:34 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

Clinton’s fire isn’t in his belly. It’s a little lower.


69 posted on 11/13/2007 11:10:47 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia ("He sees flying saucers and acts like one, too."--Hastings on Kucinich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Love your tag line!

Give the Governer Senator a harrumph!

70 posted on 11/13/2007 11:12:34 AM PST by dave k (Unplug the spin machine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jellybean

We need to get rid of Huckabee. The MSM is promoting him big time!


71 posted on 11/13/2007 11:13:29 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Deb

No problem! Good to see you again, Deb. :)


72 posted on 11/13/2007 11:47:43 AM PST by jellybean (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=dailyfread Proud Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jammer
But I think the point about Fred is that many perceive him not to have "fire in his belly" ideologically. I think we saw that (magnified) in WJC and are seeing it now in Bush--no ideological underpinnings at all.

Promoting, taking the country back to its Federalism roots isn't an ideological underpinning?

So believing in and supporting the Constitution doesn't count either?

Fred is skrewed.

It's not that he doesn't have any ideological underpinnings; its just that, apparently, no one believes in, or doesn't care about them anymore?

73 posted on 11/13/2007 12:17:14 PM PST by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues
Sorry, but voting for the lesser of two evils just doesn't cut it any more. Conservatives are pretty well fed up with the garbage the republicans have presented the voters in the last few elections. First the Reagan Democrats dropped their support of republican candidates...expect the same of conservatives if the party keeps putting up RINOs. REMEMBER...A VOTE FOR A RINO IS A VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT.

Works for me. The party elites need to learn and understand this.

74 posted on 11/13/2007 12:21:52 PM PST by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

How about someone who owns a pack of matches? How about somebody who can stay up for the 11 o’clock news?


75 posted on 11/13/2007 12:23:26 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

Why does someone have to own a pack of matches?


76 posted on 11/13/2007 1:07:17 PM PST by Rita Hayworth (Vote for a guy who had 399 House Bank overdrafts totaling $129,000? Yeah right!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Rita Hayworth

Bumping. Nicely done.


77 posted on 11/13/2007 1:15:19 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
You've got it exactly backwards--some people DO care, and they don't think Fred much cares. I don't have an opinion on Fred one way or the other, so your argument isn't with me. I was giving the perception.

But you (inadvertently) restated the argument, that he stands for those things. I maintain that the perception is that he doesn't have the "fire in the belly."

78 posted on 11/13/2007 1:31:46 PM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Oh, that Rita Taworth.


79 posted on 11/13/2007 1:45:11 PM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jammer
You've got it exactly backwards--some people DO care, and they don't think Fred much cares.

Well, as one who does care, and who understands those foundations, I see Fred as the ONLY candidate out there actually talking about them. That's why I support him.

So if there are others out there that care about getting back to our Constitutional roots, but don't believe Fred does, they haven't been paying much attention. Because he's made it perfectly clear to me.

80 posted on 11/13/2007 1:58:01 PM PST by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson