Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE...:Nation’s largest pro-life group endorses Fred Thompson
National Right To Life Committee Inc. ^ | November. 13, 2007

Posted on 11/13/2007 8:31:22 AM PST by Reagan Man

NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE SHAKES UP RACE FOR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION:

Nation’s largest pro-life group endorses Fred Thompson WASHINGTON – Marking the first major endorsement by a national grassroots organization in the Republican presidential contest, National Right to Life, the nation’s largest pro-life organization representing pro-lifers in fifty state affiliates and more than 3,000 local chapters, today announced its endorsement of former Senator Fred Thompson for President of the United States.

“As the first major grassroots organization to enter the Republican presidential race, National Right to Life is proud to endorse Fred Thompson,” stated Wanda Franz, Ph.D., president of National Right to Life. “Our endorsement is a testament to Senator Thompson’s long-standing pro-life record, his commitment to unborn children, and our belief in his ability to win.”

In making its endorsement, National Right to Life considered the position of candidates on the life issues, their records on the life issues and their ability to win.

Fred Thompson has had a strong, consistent pro-life record throughout his political career. Thompson opposes abortion and believes the 1973 abortion on demand Supreme Court decision was wrongly decided and must be reversed. During his eight years in the United States Senate, he always opposed using tax dollars to promote or pay for abortion and supported the many pro-life measures such as parental notice and consent.

Thompson has also stated his opposition to the kind of stem cell research that requires killing human embryos, while supporting the kind of stem cell research that harms no one and is the only kind producing cures.

Since announcing his candidacy in September, Fred Thompson has run second only to pro-abortion candidate Rudy Giuliani for the Republican nomination in the overwhelming majority of national polls. As pro-lifers throughout the nation begin to unite behind his candidacy, he will be well positioned to win the nomination and the presidency.

“Unlike endorsements by single individuals, this endorsement was made by representatives of statewide pro-life organizations across America which themselves are comprised of local community chapters and grassroots activists,” said Dr. Franz.

The National Right to Life Committee is the nation’s largest pro-life group with affiliates in all 50 states and over 3,000 local chapters nationwide. National Right to Life works through legislation and education to protect those threatened by abortion, infanticide, euthanasia and assisted suicide.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008endorsements; abortion; fredthompson; life; nrlc; prolifevote; rmthread; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last
To: All

At a campaign stop in South Carolina, Thompson indicated that he had given Russert’s question more thought and sought to clarify his position. “I can run on the Republican Platform. ... I have a different priority in terms of how to achieve the same objective. I think Roe v. Wade should be changed with good judges following the law. … [E]ven when Republicans had control of the Senate, we could not move that (constitutional amendment) forward.”
*****

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against allowing coverage of abortion under the Federal employees’ health insurance policies in cases where it is medically necessary - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=1&vote=00371

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe (and against almost every moderate republican in the senate) against an amendment “to express the sense of Congress in support of the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade” - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00337

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against killing an amendment to prohibit the expenditure of certain appropriated funds for the distribution or provision of, or the provision of a prescription for, postcoital emergency contraception - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00169

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe “to provide for certain disclosures and limitations with respect to the transference of human fetal tissue” - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00338

One of only 17 senators (including Helms, Gramm and Sessions) to vote against the Schumer amendment “to ensure that debts incurred as a result of clinic violence are nondischargeable.- http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00002

One of only 24 senators (including Helms and Inhofe) to vote for requiring that the Congressional-Executive Commission monitor the cooperation of the People’s Republic of China with respect to POW/MIA issues, improvement in the areas of forced abortions, slave labor, and organ harvesting, and for other purposes - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00249

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe (and against almost every moderate republican senator) against killing an amendment to prohibit the use of funds the pay for an abortion or to pay for the administrative expenses in connection with certain health plans that provide coverage for abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00197

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against Tommy Daschle’s “moderate” amendment that banned late-term abortions but affirmed Roe v. Wade - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00070

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against cloture for Henry Foster, surgeon general (and abortionist) - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=1&vote=00273

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against striking the limitation on the coverage of abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00129

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against a joint resolution that stated limitations of abortion coverage was negatively affecting population planning programs - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00013

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to prohibit the restriction of certain types of medical communications between a health care provider and a patient (i.e., abortion counseling) - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=2&vote=00283

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against an amendment “to clarify the application of certain provisions with respect to abortions where necessary to preserve the life or health of the woman” - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=1&vote=00593

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to delete language concerning certification of population programs - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=2&vote=00035

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to amend title 18, United States Code, to ban partial-birth abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=2&vote=00277

Voted with Helms, Santorum and Inhofe to to amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the use of somatic cell nuclear transfer technology for purposes of human cloning - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=2&vote=00010

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to prohibit taxpayer funding for abortions covered by the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=1&vote=00370

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against repealing the restiction on use of Department of Defense facilities for abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=2&vote=00176

Again voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to to amend title 18, United States Code, to ban partial birth abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00340

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against killing an amendment expressing “the sense of Congress concerning Roe v. Wade and partial birth abortion bans” - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00334

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe (and almost all other senators) “to protect infants who are born alive” - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=1&vote=00208

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to kill a measure to repeal the restriction on use of the Department of Defense facilities for privately funded abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00148

Voted with Helms, Thurmon, Santorum and Inhofe for a motion to ban partial birth abortions. (motion to table the motion to reconsider) - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00333

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to express the sense of Congress regarding forced abortions in the People’s Republic of China - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00243

Voted with Helms, Thurmond and Santorum to kill an amendment to repeal the restriction on the use of Department of Defense facilities for privately funded abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00134

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to proceed on a bill to ban partial birth abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00332

Voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe against Specter’s amendment “to protect the reproductive rights of Federal women prisoners” - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=1&vote=00478

Again, voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to kill an amendment repealing the restriction on use of Department of Defense facilities for abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&session=2&vote=00163

Again voted against repealing the restriction on use of Department of Defense facilities for abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00167

Again, voted with Helms, Thurmond, Santorum and Inhofe to prohibit the use of funds the pay for an abortion or to pay for the administrative expenses in connection with certain health plans that provide coverage for abortions - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00190

Voted with only 37 other senators (including Helms, Santorum and Inhofe) to prohibit the use of funds for research that utilizes human fetal tissue, cells, or organs that are obtained from a living or dead embryo or fetus during or after an induced abortion - http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00215

*****


21 posted on 11/13/2007 8:44:19 AM PST by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Petronski; dirtboy; sitetest; ejonesie22; Brices Crossroads; Politicalmom; ...

Pro-life ping.


22 posted on 11/13/2007 8:45:16 AM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
They sold out

For a guy with a 100% pro-life voting record?

and wasted their vote.

As a Hunter supporter, I'm sure you're well aware that there's no such thing as a wasted vote, right?

23 posted on 11/13/2007 8:45:59 AM PST by kevkrom (“Should government be doing this? And if so, then at what level of government?” - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; pissant

Great news. I’m sure the spoilers will come along and smear on the joy of this news, but the facts are the facts. I note they state why they made this determination, and the last one was the ability to win.

Enjoy the news politicalmom.

Enjoy pissant.


24 posted on 11/13/2007 8:46:23 AM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

A constitutional amendment banning abortion is not necessary. And it’s a waste of time and energy, because getting it passed would consume enormous amounts of both, and in the end it would probably fail.

The ERA failed, and that had a LOT of support in its day.

A constitutional amendment is not necessary, because there IS no constitutional right to an abortion. The answer to the liberal judges who have imposed their own selfish whims on the people in the guise of constitutional interpretation is not to pass a new constitutional amendment every time they make a vile decision. There’s no way you could keep up with them. It is to work on the culture, the voters, and the politicians until they are forced to nominate and confirm decent, honest judges and throw out that bogus piece of work, Roe v. Wade.

This whole constitutional amendment business is a red herring, pushed by people who want to look good but who know that it won’t pass.


25 posted on 11/13/2007 8:46:42 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"They sold out, and wasted their vote. A twofer."

There hasn't even been a single primary, and already we have sold out and wasted our votes? LOL! Just wait until our TV commercials start ripping the RINOs apart.

26 posted on 11/13/2007 8:47:08 AM PST by TommyDale (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
27 posted on 11/13/2007 8:47:31 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (I have a tagline . I just don't think the forum police will allow me to use it. THEY'RE EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
But but but Fred Thompson is bald, wrinkly, doesn't have the fire in the belly, and didn't promise to go to war with nations which have legalized abortion (meaning he is pro-choice)! Plus the nice botoxed newsman said, aside from all the Democrats, the strongest candidates were Giuliani and Huckabee.

MSM for president 2008-2036; MSM for American Representative in the United Nations People's Democracy Chamber 2036-2212!

28 posted on 11/13/2007 8:47:38 AM PST by M203M4 (Rudy Giuliani 2008 - finally get all of the government you are paying for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Flip-Flop. How convenient.


29 posted on 11/13/2007 8:47:47 AM PST by David13 ((glad to bring some HOPE to this group, LOL))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: David13

Welcome to Freerepublic!

I’m new here too, but didn’t register yesterday like you did.

It’s nice to have new people here. Though, there sure seems to be a lot of new people on Fred Threads, always critical. Only last a couple days.

Odd, isn’t it?


30 posted on 11/13/2007 8:50:09 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Pat Robertson says Fred’s pro-life credentials aren’t pure enough!”

He’s right, but didn’t he endorse Rudy?


31 posted on 11/13/2007 8:50:11 AM PST by demshateGod (Duncan Hunter for president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: M203M4

2008 Republican Presidential Primary
In GOP Race, Last Week Was Kind to Romney, McCain, and Huckabee

To begin with, new data shows Thompson is no longer seen by Republican voters as the most conservative candidate in the field. Mitt Romney earns that title for the first time and Mike Huckabee is gaining quickly. Also, the full week results for the Rasmussen Reports Presidential Tracking Poll show Thompson’s support at the lowest level since May. Romney is tied with him now and McCain just a point behind. Huckabee once again remains within hailing distance of the others and maintains his double digit level of support.


32 posted on 11/13/2007 8:50:28 AM PST by David13 ((glad to bring some HOPE to this group, LOL))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

According to RedState, the local grassroot chapters in districts and states made the decision. Which is VERY good news. That endorsement from the grassroots should mean willingness to go door to door, make the calls and send off the mailings without trying to sabotage the endorsed choice.

This is what Fred needs. A strong organization to rebut the come lately’s like Romney and or the Clintonesque candidates such as Huckabee on the issue and regain ground.

they are also among the voters most likely to vote. We’ll see how this shows up on the ground in a month.


33 posted on 11/13/2007 8:50:37 AM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod
He’s right, but didn’t he endorse Rudy?

So the National Right to Life Committee's pro-life credentials aren't pure enough either?

34 posted on 11/13/2007 8:51:26 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I have been wondering if Freddie Thompson might withdraw from the race and endorse McCain. He could complain, as Walter F. Mondale did in 1975, that he is tired of living in Holiday Inns. Many seem to think that Thompson lacks the fire in the belly.


35 posted on 11/13/2007 8:51:56 AM PST by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David13
>>>>>Monday, he said he would not back a federal constitutional amendment criminalizing abortion — a plank of the Republican platform for more than one-quarter century ....

Not true. That wording is not part of the GOP platform.

~~~ We oppose abortion, but our pro-life agenda does not include punitive action against women who have an abortion.

36 posted on 11/13/2007 8:52:19 AM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: David13

How refreshing...a n00b who isn’t for Mitt, but Huck...welcome n00b.


37 posted on 11/13/2007 8:52:36 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (I have a tagline . I just don't think the forum police will allow me to use it. THEY'RE EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Yes...

No brace for the impact of the Mitt Fans...

4321...


38 posted on 11/13/2007 8:53:02 AM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
It also means the local grassroots chapters were NOT fooled by Slick Willard's bought-and-paid "endorsements" and Road to Ames Conversion.

That's very encouraging.

39 posted on 11/13/2007 8:53:19 AM PST by Petronski (F-R-E-D! Fred! Fred! Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Not sure why it is odd. New people have opinions too. I have read FR for years. Thought I would come on and join the fun. I started with Duncan Hunter, determined he could not win, I went with Thompson until he decided to take a week off after he started so late. And noticed he did not have the energy level needed to win the general election. A Bob Dole without the credentials. Now I am with Huckabee.


40 posted on 11/13/2007 8:53:37 AM PST by David13 ((glad to bring some HOPE to this group, LOL))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson