Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

World’s First Image Taking of the Moon by HDTV (HD Luna)
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency ^ | 11/10/07 | JAXA

Posted on 11/10/2007 7:54:30 PM PST by NormsRevenge

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation) have successfully performed the world's first high-definition image taking by the lunar explorer "KAGUYA" (SELENE,) which was injected into a lunar orbit at an altitude of about 100 km on October 18, 2007, (Japan Standard Time. Following times and dates are all JST.)

The image shooting was carried out by the onboard high definition television (HDTV) of the KAGUYA, and it is the world's first high definition image data acquisition of the Moon from an altitude about 100 kilometers away from the Moon.

The image taking was performed twice on October 31. Both were eight-fold speed intermittent shooting (eight minutes is converged to one minute.) The first shooting covered from the northern area of the "Oceanus Procellarum" toward the center of the North Pole, then the second one was from the south to the north on the western side of the "Oceanus Procellarum." The moving image data acquired by the KAGUYA was received at the JAXA Usuda Deep Space Center, and processed by NHK.

The satellite was confirmed to be in good health through telemetry data received at the Usuda station.


TOPICS: Japan; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: hdtv; image; jaxa; kaguya; moon; taking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

North Pole Area (still image cut out from the first image shooting)

This is a still image taken out from the first moving image shooting when the KAGUYA flew from the northern area of the "Oceanus Procellarum"(*1) to the center of the North Pole.

As the altitude near the North Pole is high, the angle of the coming sunlight was lower, thus the shade of the crater topography looks long in the image.

The moving image was taken at 4:07 a.m. on October 31, 2007 (JST) by eight-fold speed intermittent shooting (eight minutes is converged to one minute) from the KAGUYA, and the data was received at the JAXA Usuda Deep Space Center on the same day.

(*1) Oceanus Procellarum: The dark area on the Moon's surface called "ocean." It is located at the left end of the northern hemisphere on the front side of the Moon when we look up at it from the Earth.

1 posted on 11/10/2007 7:54:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Click on the

Moving image of the Moon shot by the HDTV camera
(480X270px, no audio)

http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071107_kaguya_e.html

a pretty coool video


2 posted on 11/10/2007 7:56:34 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Are there preferential trajectories for impacts on the moon or was the bombardment about the same from all directions?


3 posted on 11/10/2007 7:58:06 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Yeah right. There’s no space program! It’s all filmed in a studio on Okinawa!

(SARC/)


4 posted on 11/10/2007 7:58:20 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

beats me.. looks like it got it pretty good all over


5 posted on 11/10/2007 7:59:24 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It looks computer generated to me.


6 posted on 11/10/2007 8:00:36 PM PST by wastedyears (One Marine vs. 550 consultants. Sounds like good odds to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The reason I ask is because if most of the stuff hitting the moon is coming in on the ecliptic, then you’d expect more elongated impacts in the polar regions.


7 posted on 11/10/2007 8:02:06 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Wow...

Cool post!


8 posted on 11/10/2007 8:02:21 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
good question tho,, considering that some could be the result of swarms of cosmic debris , some at random , others not quite so.. the moon doesn't rotate so I'll be curious if they can get shots of the alien bases on the back side. ;-) pretty good little device..

The High Definition Television (prior to loading on the KAGUYA)

9 posted on 11/10/2007 8:03:12 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Pretty high quality stuff, huh?


10 posted on 11/10/2007 8:03:46 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I saw a program that studied meteors. The idea was to figure out why earth’s surface wasn’t pelted like the moon. Aside from the atmosphere, there actually are all sorts of craters on earth. It’s just that vegetation and erosion wipe it way, make it less noticeable. Everything on the moon, is permanent, without an atmosphere.
11 posted on 11/10/2007 8:11:38 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Very cool...thanks for posting it.


12 posted on 11/10/2007 8:25:51 PM PST by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I would have been shocked if there were audio.

And no, I’m not Richard Hoagland or Muhammad Ali.


13 posted on 11/10/2007 8:26:35 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“the moon doesn’t rotate “

Actually it does rotate approximately once per month.


14 posted on 11/10/2007 8:28:16 PM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

yur kidding? I never noticed. I stand corrected. Thanks!


15 posted on 11/10/2007 8:35:11 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
The craters on the moon are largest and most numerous facing the earth, and are fairly "young", because they do not show a advanced "crater creep", the gradual crumbling and flattening out of crater walls. The craters on the other side are much smaller and fewer. Why this is is covered here: fountains of the deep
16 posted on 11/10/2007 8:37:43 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

sure it rotates, but the side facing the earth always faces the earth.


17 posted on 11/10/2007 8:41:43 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"I'll be curious if they can get shots of the alien bases on the back side. ;-) pretty good little device..

Oh Oh! Superman's ice castle will be discovered.

18 posted on 11/10/2007 8:43:33 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Professional

erosion occurs on the moon as well, but at a different rate.
If you look closely you can see newer, smaller craters on the moon beside the larger older ones.

The earth has far less craters on it. Nasa has some good pics which shows them.

A theory for why the moon has more craters on it facing the earth is because the stuff that made them came from the earth to begin with, during a catastrophic event. The earth is quite easily capable of producing the power needed to propel very large chunks of it’s surface crust to escape velocities.


19 posted on 11/10/2007 8:53:01 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

“The earth is quite easily capable of producing the power needed to propel very large chunks of it’s surface crust to escape velocities.”

EXCUSE ME!! Since when did the Earth acquire this ability? Anytime recent?


20 posted on 11/10/2007 8:59:24 PM PST by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson