He has no chance of winning the general election. It's time to find an electable nominee that can unite the base.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
There is no such animal.
And aren't you popping the champaign? He's no contest for your girl.
Time to throw Rudy under the bus!!! Long over due!
Rudy cannot beat Hilary. Dem-lite won’t beat a real dem. We need a real alternative. A pro-gay, pro-abort, dress wearing, and pro-illegal candidate isn’t a great alternative.
I’m sorry but if Americans would rather vote
for Hillary the pathological liar Jesus himself
could not defeat her.
I guess Ron Paul is our only salvation.
“Despite Hillary’s recent gaffes, Giuliani has lost significant ground in all three polls.
He has no chance of winning the general election. It’s time to find an electable nominee that can unite the base.”
You guys are making WAY too much of this poll. Click the link. This poll was done among “American adults,” not likely voters or even registered voters. To get an accurate read on which direction the election might go, you need to poll those voters who self-identify as being likely to vote, not just poll any old schmo who answers the phone, who may not even be registered to vote, who might not even be a citizen of the country!
Rasmussen on the other hand which polls LIKELY voters, shows Rudy beating Hillary by 2 points. That is a much more accurate and meaningful poll than these 2 that just asks anyone who answers the phone.
Besides, for all those saying this shows Giuliani has to be thrown under the bus, it’s not as if any polls are showing the other Republicans performing better than Rudy against Hillary. So what’s the logic here? I think it’s interesting how so many of us poo poo polls, until they enable us to say “See! Rudy sucks!” which really these 2 worthless polls do not allow us to say.
“Despite Hillary’s recent gaffes, Giuliani has lost significant ground in all three polls.
He has no chance of winning the general election. It’s time to find an electable nominee that can unite the base.”
You guys are making WAY too much of this poll. Click the link. This poll was done among “American adults,” not likely voters or even registered voters. To get an accurate read on which direction the election might go, you need to poll those voters who self-identify as being likely to vote, not just poll any old schmo who answers the phone, who may not even be registered to vote, who might not even be a citizen of the country!
Rasmussen on the other hand which polls LIKELY voters, shows Rudy beating Hillary by 2 points. That is a much more accurate and meaningful poll than these 2 that just asks anyone who answers the phone.
Besides, for all those saying this shows Giuliani has to be thrown under the bus, it’s not as if any polls are showing the other Republicans performing better than Rudy against Hillary. So what’s the logic here? I think it’s interesting how so many of us poo poo polls, until they enable us to say “See! Rudy sucks!” which really these 2 worthless polls do not allow us to say.
Our economy is rather erratic right now, and I think there are many things which will be held against the right (despite any reasonable explanation). Rudy’s the wrong choice in any case.
I agree. The best chose is to unite the base....
I’m sure this wil be very comforting to the beast on the way down.
It really kind of depends on the internals of the polls. What if they oversampled blacks and Hispanics? What if they oversampled women? Without knowing the composition of people they sampled, we don’t really know if the numbers are accurate. And few of the pollsters ever release these numbers - probably because they’re afraid of having their polls picked apart.
Wow. I did a double take when I first read that as,"...the Marxist College Institute..."
OK, who?
Don’t trust CNN/Opinion polls, they are Clinton operatives/Gupta the corruptor.
I am not voting for either of these idiots.
I don’t like Rudy but these polls are less tahn worthless. Any poll showing Hillary winning among men is garbage of the third kind. Hillary will lose the male vote by 10-15 points.
Other polling shows that more than 50% of the population would not vote for Clinton at any time or under any circumstances. So how does she get 50% in this Marist poll?
I do not see any GOP beating Hillary at this point. Rudy is not my candidate of choice, but I do not see another GOP candidate that is doing that well. None of these candidates is without serious flaws, but some are more flawed than others. I will predict that no matter which candidate receives the party’s nomination, there are going to be a significant number of Republicans that will not support him. At some point in time, people are going to have to decide whether any GOP candidate is better than Hillary.
Thats fine,polls can state that, but Neither will be on the Ballots in November!!
The odds are small, but there’s a chance both hillary and Rudy will not be their party’s nominees. If Hillary loses in Iowa, I think she’s in big trouble.