Posted on 11/09/2007 10:32:39 AM PST by Chi-townChief
This was no mistake. Clintoon’s make mistakes, but not this kind of mistake. It was premeditated and so was the aftermath. In the end, the only ones left out in the cold were the press............
With the Clintons, its always a “misunderstanding”.
Since when have the Clintons ever cared about inconveniencing others?
I agree. That’s it in a nutshell. And that ‘true blue’ is a figment of their imagination, not yours and mine.
We didnt want to come off as a secretive or back-door meeting.
Translates to: "Who the h*ll told YOU about our secret meeting?"
She didn’t want to be recorded doing another southern fire-and-brimstone preacher accent.
blatant:
adjective
-brazenly obvious; flagrant: a blatant error in simple addition; a blatant lie.
-tastelessly conspicuous: the blatant colors of the dress.
I don't think he meant to say what he said!
The Clintons (and the Democratic machine in general)are always trying to do stuff under the radar, such as filling the ballot boxes at election time with votes from dead people, and coersing their voting block (which includes most minority voters)with their lies about Republicans. We KNOW that the Republican Party, and Conservatives especially, have done more to advance minorities in our society than the Democratic Party has EVER done. President Lincoln fought to end slavery, and he was a Republican. Republicans amended the Constitution to grant blacks citizenship and the the right to vote. It was the Republicans who pushed for civil rights legislation from Lincoln’s time up through the 1960’s, against the objections of Democrats.
So when Clinton is preventing the Media from being present at his “one-on-one” with minorities, you wonder just what wool they’re trying to pull over the minorities’ eyes this time. Not that the Media can be depended upon to report honestly or openly on anything their beloved liberal co-consirators are up to.
When is the FEC going to step in and go after the electioneering behind the church pulpits that the DEMs are so fond of doing in the black churches?!
And Hillary screams that the Bush administration is secretive? Come on, this whole thing smells bad and chances are it has to do with voting “irregularities”...Sad thing is, blacks just continue to thwart their own independence when they lay down at the democratic altar of subjection.
Traci Otey Blunt, outreach and partnerships manager, National 5 A Day for Better Health Program, discusses the Men's 9 A Day Campaign at the Black History Month 2004 community event.
You’re right. I couldn’t agree more.
Bill showed us what a one party state could turn into. And he also showed us what a one party nation could turn into, with the media’s help.
It’s too bad there are so many mentall ill people out there. I guess someone was bound to exploit them sooner or later.
Also .... by claiming that this event wasn’t to endorse Hellary .. then Hellary campaign funds don’t have to pick up the tab for the expenses
Exactly!
The Clintons will also have them bused in to vote even when the polls aren't open, ask Jay Dickey in Arkansas!
On the Sunday before Election Day, in GOP Rep. Jay Dickey's Arkansas district, black preachers told their congregations that there would be no sermon that day -- instead they were all going to the polls, which had been specially (and illegally) opened for the purpose of their casting their votes. Is anyone confused about whom the votes might have been for?
Hi Kathy....yes, we just can’t get rid of them!
Thank God, Chelsea does not (yet?) appear to have any political aspirations...LOL
LOL! Thank God indeed!
The modern, urban, religio-politico, Rev. James L. Demus:
Im a fan of [Sen. Barack] Obama ... but when it comes to who I feel is the best qualified from Day One to lead this country, with hands down it is Hillary Clinton.
(Ask him why he feels Hillary’s best qualified and you’ll get the same kind of doubletalk Hillary spewed about giving illegals licenses, or else you’ll get the brushoff.)
But not surprising.
When she says she prefers the term progressive and wants to get back to what the word liberal used to mean at the beginning of the century (as she said in that first youtube debate), she is referring to flat out marxism. Progressive is the term that those early US communists back at the turn of the century when Lenin was king used to call themselves so as to avoid direct identification as communists.
I doubt most liberals know it, but calling themselves progressives isn’t actually a new term, but rather, an old one.
One would expect her to at least traipse around the hallowed grounds of her mentor, Saul Alinski. Ol' Saul would be disappointed, and would probably admonish her by saying, 'Hillary, where there are no women, be thou a woman.' (paraphrasing a quote to Alinsky by a rabbi, who admonished Saul at one time to be a man where there were no men.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.