Skip to comments.
Ronald Reagan Library Can't Locate 80,000 Items
Fox News ^
| November 08, 2007
| Unknown
Posted on 11/08/2007 4:07:45 PM PST by decimon
WASHINGTON The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library cannot account for the whereabouts of tens of thousands of artifacts relating to the country's 40th president, FOX News has confirmed.
< >
The audit of all 12 presidential libraries found that the Reagan Library couldn't locate more than 80,000 pieces of the collection, out of roughly 100,000 items.
< >
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archivetheft; librarytheft; reaganlibrary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
My math may be weak but 80,000 out or 100,000 seems to be 80 percent.
1
posted on
11/08/2007 4:07:46 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Check the Clinton Library, maybe?
2
posted on
11/08/2007 4:09:57 PM PST
by
Old Sarge
(This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
To: decimon
They’re over at my house. But I swear I paid for them.
3
posted on
11/08/2007 4:10:48 PM PST
by
Publius
(A = A)
To: decimon
4
posted on
11/08/2007 4:12:39 PM PST
by
Clock King
(Bring the noise!)
To: decimon
To: decimon
Aw frack, I even donated to this place. :(
To: Clock King
To: Clock King; mkmensinger
Has Sandy been seen in really baggy pants? :-)
8
posted on
11/08/2007 4:14:58 PM PST
by
decimon
To: Romneyfor President2008
Aw frack, I even donated to this place. :(A letter expressing displeasure with their stewardship of the library may be in order.
9
posted on
11/08/2007 4:17:11 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Anybody seen Sandy Burgl... er, Burger around the Reagan library?
10
posted on
11/08/2007 4:18:49 PM PST
by
redhead
(Victory first; then peace)
To: decimon
Statistical methods are very effective when applied to a population of 100,000 items.
It's really very simple to generate a list of one or two hundred items randomly from the records of the entire collection. One then locates each of the randomly selected items. The fraction of items not found will very closely match the fraction of the entire collection that is missing.
Such a procedure is SO EASY that any director of such a library collection is guilty of criminal negligence not to have carried out such a process at least annually.
To identify the criminals in this case, one need only examine the records of the library to determine which directors carried out such a process and which didn't. The breach of trust in this case appears to be quite astounding.
11
posted on
11/08/2007 4:19:43 PM PST
by
William Tell
(RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
To: mkmensinger
Wheres Sandy Burglar? LOL...And in a completely unrelated story the Clinton Library recently discovered 80,000 items that purport to show how Bill Clinton's presidency saved the world from Communism.
12
posted on
11/08/2007 4:20:26 PM PST
by
Gator101
(Don't tase me, Bro!)
To: decimon; Clock King; mkmensinger
13
posted on
11/08/2007 4:20:27 PM PST
by
redhead
(Victory first; then peace)
To: decimon
14
posted on
11/08/2007 4:20:42 PM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(The Democrat Party: radical Islam's last hope)
To: Romneyfor President2008
Romneyfor President2008 said:
"Aw frack, I even donated to this place. :(" Then you probably had a reasonable expectation that the caretakers of the library would carry out their duties in a manner which is consistent with preserving the value of the assets of the library. If they did not do so, then they have defrauded you. Sounds like you have a case to me.
15
posted on
11/08/2007 4:23:23 PM PST
by
William Tell
(RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
To: decimon
Gee! When 80% of your stuff goes missing, wouldn’t you think the room might seem empty even before it got to 80%?
16
posted on
11/08/2007 4:23:53 PM PST
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: William Tell
Assuming we ever hear of this again, it will be interesting to see what is the fallout. Theft? Sloppy record keeping? Martians? Does anyone pay a price for whatever?
17
posted on
11/08/2007 4:26:14 PM PST
by
decimon
To: Red_Devil 232
18
posted on
11/08/2007 4:27:25 PM PST
by
mware
(Americans in armchairs....doing the job of the media.)
To: Red_Devil 232
Gee! When 80% of your stuff goes missing, wouldnt you think the room might seem empty even before it got to 80%?Yes, you would think so. I'm kinda doubting the figures are as they seem but it sounds bad in any case.
19
posted on
11/08/2007 4:28:13 PM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
20
posted on
11/08/2007 4:29:56 PM PST
by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson