Missouri Republican Assembly Endorses Duncan Hunter for President

Dhgrassrevolt ^ | 11/5/07 | staff

[AuntB]

Did you all see the new FR Poll?

(11/6) Which one of the following candidates should pro-life conservatives rally behind to defeat the liberal abortionists Hillary and Giuliani?

Mike Huckabee
Duncan Hunter
John McCain
Mitt Romney
Tom Tancredo
Fred Thompson

[section9]

I don't like to pee on the parade here, but the Republican Assemblies crowd usually lends their support to people who

a) give the national RA leadership gobs of money.

b) vote for candidates who couldn't beat the late, great Paul Tibbets if they held an election for Mayor of Hiroshima.

These are the kind of people who think that Alan Keyes could actually win an election for dogcatcher.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[pissant]

I hate a group like this:

---

Our Objectives

To recruit, educate, train and motivate individuals to run for public office who are irrevocably committed to uphold and fight for constitutional principles and the preservation of the Republic.

To increase Republican voter registration.

To promote conservatism in the tradition of the Founding Fathers.

To bring back to the Republican Party those who have been disaffected by the perception that the party has moved away from its core principles.

To watchdog elected officials and insure their adherence to conservative Republican principles.

To identify and oppose those individuals, groups and agendas that would, knowingly or otherwise, bring about the loss of our freedoms and the destruction of our Republic through the violation of the Constitution and the erosion of the traditional family or public morals.

To inform the public regarding correct principles relative to issues and the qualifications of candidates for public office.

To maintain the integrity of the Republican Party platform based on correct moral and constitutional principles. Then to use the platform as a criterion of accountability for elected officials.

[Man50D]

Well, Hunter voted for knocking down old people.

Only illegals. ;O)

[Paperdoll]

>The more Thompson performs poorly, the better Hunter looks at the best hope of Conservatives.<

And Hunter doesn’t have to ask for a round of applause. He gets them for what he says, and how he says it; for what he does and how he does it! GO DUNCAN HUNTER!

[Paperdoll]

>What about Hunter/Condi?<

>>I’ll lose all respect for him if he picks her. No way!<<

Condi is part of the globalist Establishment. We want no more Clintons, no more Bushes, and no more globalist Establishment!

[Cheapskate]

This makes me want to move from ILLinois!!!!!

[ZULU]

Well, that would be nice. I think Hunter has the better credentials as a conservative.

[AuntB]

The Iowa debate is leaving out Hunter and Tancredo!

Email the Iowa heads of the Repub party!

rayhoffmann@iowagop.org, lmosley7@mchsi.com, claudner@iowagop.org, psd@nyemaster.com, kpearson@kaas-emp.com, phyllisk@fiai.net, steveroberts@lawiowa.com, guntherg@cfu.net, jlsGOPFan@hotmail.com, SLScheffler@aol.com, danielenicholson@mchsi.com, loras007@southslope.net, johnjortega@msn.com, bvernon@moyerbergman.com, TFSporer@sporerlaw.com, ddj28@mchsi.com, wra1977@cableone.net, bonniehall@signatureblue.com, reid.houser@sitel.com, thebizpro@hotmail.com, phoner@nethtc.net, mark@markjlucas.com“

[Just another Joe]

Can we get a source on that statement, AuntB?
I'd like to tell them where the information came from.

[kevkrom]

Love it when Fredheads make the claim that DH voted for CFR

rface is no FredHead.

[AuntB]

I should have given a link.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1921927/posts

The Iowa Republican Party and Fox News Channel announced today plans for a Dec. 4 debate of the GOP presidential campaigns in Des Moines.

The Tuesday evening event is scheduled for Hy-Vee Hall in Des Moines and comes as the race to the Jan. 3 caucuses enters its final month.

It was unclear who would attend, although only those candidates who had support of at least 5 percent of those surveyed in recent national polls or The Des Moines Register’s Iowa Poll are invited, Iowa GOP officials said.

That would include former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Arizona Sen. John McCain, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson.

It could leave out U.S. Reps. Duncan Hunter of California and Tom Tancredo of Colorado.

[Just another Joe]

Here's my reply

I understand from the Media with Conscience website (http://mwcnews.net/content/view/17897&Itemid=1) that you are considering leaving out Representative Duncan Hunter from the debate.

So, the heads of the Iowa (conservative?) GOP are going to leave out one of the actual conservatives that is in contention for the candidacy?

I’m sorry, but could you show me the logic behind letting a liberal, so called Republican, like Rudy Giuliani remain in the debate and showing a conservative Republican, like Duncan Hunter, the door.

If you are really conservatives you will keep a CONSERVATIVE viewpoint in the debates.
Sincerely,

[Just another Joe]

And only got one refusal back.

SLScheffler@aol.com on 11/7/2007 2:21 PM
The e-mail system was unable to deliver the message, but did not report a specific reason. Check the address and try again. If it still fails, contact your system administrator.
< outbound8-sin-R.bigfish.com #5.0.0 X-Postfix; host mailin-01.mx.aol.com[64.12.137.184] said: 550 We would love to have gotten this email to slscheffler@aim.com. But, your recipient never logged onto their free AIM Mail account. Please contact them and let them know that they're missing out on all the super features offered by AIM Mail. And by the way, they're also missing out on your email. Thanks. (in reply to RCPT TO command)>

[AuntB]

Yours sounds a lot like the letter I sent them. :<)

[Calpernia]

B4DH!

[Man50D]

Per the article; Contact Mary Tiffany (515)282-8105

The four criteria the Iowa Republican party is using for candidates to enter the debate are as follows:

1. Announced a formal campaign for President: and

2. Filed the necessary paperwork with the Federal Election Commission; and

3. Met all U.S. constitutional requirements; and

4. Garnered at least 5% of the national electorate as determined by an average of the most recent national telephone polls of registered voters conducted by non-partisan public opinion polling organizations leading up to the registration deadline as determined by Fox News Channel and the Republican Party of Iowa or garnered an average of at least 5% in the most recent polls of Iowa voters conducted by the American Research Group and the Des Moines Register.

Polls can be very unreliable for the following reasons:

1. They poll a very small fraction of the population.
2. Pollsters can target a group of people who pollsters know will respond to questions in a certain manner.
3. Questions can be structured for a specific response.
4. Pollsters can disregard answers they deem undesirable.

[gidget7]

there it is indeed!

BTTT

[gidget7]

“Not in my book. I’m very disappointed in Condi’s performance as Secy of State particularly regarding Israel.”

You and me too. AND on some crutial social issues as well!

[gidget7]

“Condi is part of the globalist Establishment. We want no more Clintons, no more Bushes, and no more globalist Establishment!”

So is Thompson. He is a member of the other CFR, council on foreign relations. Seems more and more that council is all about globalization.