Posted on 11/07/2007 4:48:38 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
OK, class, someone tell us: what's been the attitude of the New York Times and the elite media at large toward democracy-building in Iraq?
What's that, Johnny? That it was naive for George Bush to imagine that democracy was attainable in a Muslim country riven by religious and ethnic factions? Correct.
OK, then, who'd like to predict the Times's reaction to Pres. Bush's measured response to the curtailing of democracy in Pakistan by Pervez Musharraf, perhaps our most important ally in the region in the war against terrorism?
What's that, Janie? Pakistan being another Muslim country riven by religious and ethnic factions, George Bush has adopted the appropriately pragmatic course? Story Continues Below Ad ↓
Wrong!
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Bush can’t win with NY Times. Ping to Today show list.
UPDATE: I’m scheduled to appear this mornng at about 10:33 on the G. Gordon Liddy show to discuss this issue.
Liberals are so bereft of ideas and ways to solve problems. Anyone can be against something, however it takes integrity, honesty and and character to come up with workable solutions. They have spent the last eight years hating Bush.
Fires, floods, hurricanes, and anything that happens that is bad in the entire world is Bush’s fault.
It has been reasonably successful until they have to run for office.
Hilary has to mention Bush 25 times in a debate. However she has no answers to what she would do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.