Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Flips Over her Debate Flop
ifeminists.net ^ | November 6, 2007 | Carey Roberts

Posted on 11/06/2007 10:48:14 AM PST by FreeManDC

What are we to make of a presidential candidate who portrays herself as strong and independent, a courageous exemplar to the members of her gender -- but at the first hint of criticism collapses as the pitiable victim of gender politics?

Last Tuesday Hillary Clinton delivered a horrendous performance at the Democratic debate. She claimed she wanted to end the war in Iraq -- and in the next breath explained that as president, she would continue to guard our embassy, provide training, and continue to wage the fight against Al Qaeda.

As far as allowing illegal aliens to get a driver's license, her answer was more convoluted than a New York City subway map. And when it came to rescuing the Social Security system, she declared, "I do have a plan, but personally I am not going to be advocating any specific fix until I am seriously approaching fiscal responsibility."

Huh?

Debate moderator Tim Russert tried without success to pin her down. Finally candidate John Edwards stated the obvious: "Unless I missed something, Senator Clinton said two different things in the course of about two minutes." Barack Obama of Illinois added, "She had not been truthful and clear."

Clinton launched an immediate counter-offensive. First she accused Russert of playing "gotcha." No, Hillary, he was trying to clarify your contradictory statements - that's what a moderator is supposed to do.

Then the Clinton campaign released a memo called "The Politics of Pile-On." Implying that her competitors weren't bowing and scraping to the inevitability of her nomination, the statement ended with the incongruous claim that Hillary is "One strong woman."

Still fixated on playing the gender card, Clinton's media spinners held a conference call. Senior strategist Mark Penn make the shrill claim that he was already "detecting some backlash" among female voters because they fretted the debate had turned into an ugly "six-on-one to try to bring her down."

Would someone please order the de-caf next time?

Clinton's surrogates in the media rose to the occasion, but their comments were so off base I wondered if they had actually watched the debate. "Her fighting spirit was all the more impressive because so many of the positions she was defending were virtually indefensible," Gail Collins argued in Thursday's New York Times. Problem was, no one could figure out exactly what positions she was defending.

Then HRC's handlers had the gall to send out a fund-raising letter condemning the men's actions with the plea, "Hillary's going to need your help."

But the counter-offensive stalled when bloggers ridiculed Clinton's scripted and evasive answers. Commentator Jed Babbin noted, "But one thing isn't in doubt after Tuesday night: Hillary Clinton can dish it out, but she can't take it." Jennifer Rubin satirized, "Indeed it is sometimes difficult to follow the Hillary rules of etiquette."

Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker offered this sisterly advice: "Sorry, but when girls insist on playing hardball with the boys, they don't get to cry foul - or change the game to dodge ball - when they get bruised."

Clinton's Democratic rivals kept the heat on. Asked on NBC's Today show whether Clinton was trying to play the gender card, Barack Obama responded it didn't make sense that when "people start challenging her point of view, that suddenly, she backs off and says, 'Don't pick on me.'"

John Edwards hit on Hillary's double-standard. "I think that Senator Clinton ought to be held to the same standard that every presidential candidate is held to," Edwards told reporters. "That standard is to not engage in double-talk."

Finally Mrs. Clinton made a lame effort to defuse the controversy. "I don't think they're picking on me because I'm a woman; I think they're picking on me because I'm winning."

"Picking on me"?

When Barack Obama was excoriated for offering to meet with Fidel Castro, I don't remember him saying he was being singled out because of his skin color. And when persons ridiculed John Edwards for his $300 haircuts, he didn't provide the sad-sack defense of being "picked on."

In the past, playing the victim worked wonders for Mrs. Clinton. During her eight years as First Lady, her highest approval ratings came in the wake of the Monica Lewinsky scandal. And following a debate with candidate Rick Lazio, Clinton and her aides claimed that his actions were "menacing" and "threatening."

But in 2007, the last thing our country needs is a candidate who uses divisive gender tactics to satisfy her need for personal satisfaction and political gain.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; clinton; democratparty; electionpresident; elections; hillary; hillaryclinton; presidentialdebates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: what_not2007

Not Chubby Checkers, The Coasters................see #19.........


21 posted on 11/06/2007 11:42:08 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

She's almost got it right...........

22 posted on 11/06/2007 11:45:17 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: what_not2007

Her pantsuits seem to be cheap knock-offs of Chubby Checkers early 60’s clothing.


23 posted on 11/06/2007 11:45:40 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: what_not2007

No. It was the Coasters. Chubby Checker never recorded that song.


24 posted on 11/06/2007 12:00:06 PM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC
John Edwards hit on Hillary (Edited for fun)

Eeeeeeew .......What would those kids be like?

25 posted on 11/06/2007 12:01:55 PM PST by fella (The proper application of the truth far more important than the knowledge of it's existance."Ike")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman; Red Badger

Yes, I’ve been corrected already.

Thanks for keeping me straight.


26 posted on 11/06/2007 12:03:49 PM PST by hoe_cake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FreeManDC
I’m not willing to predict it will happen, because I’m just not that good at seeing the future; but should the Beast fall on her face and drag her party down with her, it will be the most entertaining spectacle since the Adrian Peterson show last Sunday.
27 posted on 11/06/2007 5:57:15 PM PST by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson