Hillary’s CommieNazi Constituency - Senator Clinton’s interesting allies.

National Review Online ^ | November 05, 2007 | Mark Hemingway

[neverdem]

November 05, 2007, 0:45 p.m.

Hillary’s CommieNazi Constituency
Senator Clinton’s interesting allies.

By Mark Hemingway

Hillary Clinton had a rough go of it last week. First, she gave a mixed performance at the Democratic presidential debate on Tuesday. After dominating early on, she got hammered hard by her opponents, and gave a series of bafflingly contradictory answers.

Then on Thursday, Bush gave a speech defending his national-security record and attacking the Democratic congressional leadership. All Senator Clinton had to do was find an opening and take it, assert her opposition to Bush, and grab a few headlines at the expense of an angry Democratic base that’s almost Pavlovian in its dislike of the president. That would have been enough to remind everyone that she’s still the frontrunner.

How’d she do? Well, judging by her reaction to the president’s speech, it was a swing and a miss:

George Bush’s faulty and offensive historical analogies aren’t going to end the war in Iraq, make America safer or bring our troops home. Americans are tired of the President’s efforts to play politics with national security and practice the politics of division.

What “faulty and offensive” historical analogies did Bush make? Here’s the relevant excerpt from Bush’s speech:

History teaches that underestimating the words of evil, ambitious men is a terrible mistake. In the early 1900s, the world ignored the words of Lenin, as he laid out his plans to launch a Communist revolution in Russia — and the world paid a terrible price. The Soviet Empire he established killed tens of millions, and brought the world to the brink of thermonuclear war.

In the 1920s, the world ignored the words of Hitler, as he explained his intention to build an Aryan super-state in Germany, take revenge on Europe, and eradicate the Jews — and the world paid a terrible price. His Nazi regime killed millions in the gas chambers, and set the world aflame in war, before it was finally defeated at a terrible cost in lives and treasure.

Bin Laden and his terrorist allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them. And the question is: Will we listen? America and our coalition partners are listening. We have made our choice. We take the words of the enemy seriously.

As “Campaign Spot” Jim Geraghty sensibly wondered “How, exactly, is comparing Osama bin Laden to Lenin and Hitler offensive? Who’s being offended by that comparison?”

“Absolutely it was offensive. Lenin liberated the Russian people, Hitler tried to enslave them,” Jarvis Tyner, executive director of the Communist Party USA, told National Review Online in response. I assume by “liberated the Russian people,” Tyner didn’t mean “killed two to three million of them” — but hey, to-may-to, to-mah-to, right? After our initial phone conversation, Tyner called me right back because he’d already forgotten to whom he’d just spoken. When I told him again I was calling from National Review Online he began laughing hysterically. “You guys are secretly pro-Communist, right?” At least he was taking my inquiry in stride.

But before his borscht got cold, Tyner wanted to make one thing clear: “We definitely feel very strongly that whoever the Democrat is, they ought to beat the hell out of George Bush. He is a disaster for this world and this country,” he said. Fair enough.

Still, now that the Commies had weighed in, I could think of one other possible group that might be offended by the President’s speech. The chairman of the American Nazi Party is rather improbably named Rocky J. Suhayda. Less improbably, he answers his e-mail promptly — I’m guessing the trains run on time in that office.

When asked about it, Rocky wasn’t bothered by Bush’s analogy involving his beloved Führer:

Are we of the American Nazi Party ‘offended’ by Emperor ‘Red Beak’ Bush's comparison of Bin Ladin with Adolf Hitler? Of course not! There was once a fellow named George Washington, and associates — I suppose the stuttering retard would have attempted to send them to Gitmo too — this corrupt Judeo-Capitalist Empire, has created in its greed all the ills now besetting the American White Working Class — and its long overdue, that’s it’s chickens are only beginning to come home to roost! [sic]

I don’t know about you, but I kept waiting for that deranged sentence to come home to roost.
So if you’re keeping score, Hillary Clinton finds Bush’s historical analogy, comparing Osama Bin Laden to Hitler and Lenin, wrong and offensive. She is joined by the Communist Party USA, who also find the analogy offensive — apparently because Lenin didn’t do anything wrong. The American Nazi Party is, frankly, flattered by the comparison — which it gleefully extends to George Washington for reasons only a mental health professional knows. And everybody involved hates George W. Bush.

Somehow I doubt these are the ideological compatriots Clinton was seeking out when she suggested that the President’s analogy was “faulty and offensive.” But if the American Nazi Party and Communist Party USA are not the company in which Clinton wishes to place herself, then what did she mean? I, for one, would be grateful for some clarification about exactly how evil the Senator regards Osama Bin Laden — if he’s not fairly mentioned in the same breath as Hitler and Lenin.

Otherwise, I might suggest that the Senator’s Clintonian parsing has gotten out of hand. Or have we really reached a point at which it depends on what your definition of “megalomaniacal threat to Western civilization” is?

— Mark Hemingway is an NRO staff reporter.
— Mark Hemingway is a writer in Washington, D.C.

[PGalt]

:) Good article by Mark Hemmingway. Thanks for posting.

[Cicero]

Just to be fair all around, shouldn’t he have asked al Qaeda what THEY thought of Bush’s comparison? Probably they were offended too, just like hillary.

Or if al Qaeda was unavailable for comment, perhaps he could have asked al Jazeera, or CNN.

[gitmo]

I once had a long conversation with a former president of the American Nazi Party. They consider themselves on the polar opposite end of Communists. Yet they seem to bear identical fruit to me.

[potlatch]

[The_Media_never_lie]

Outstanding. I am scared almost speechless by the thought of Hillary in the WH. Obama would be a much better leader; Hillary isn't even likable.

If H is elected, here come at least 4 years of class warfare and paranoia. She has little leadership qualities, outside her constituency, the people she panders to.

[JennysCool]

But before his borscht got cold, Tyner wanted to make one thing clear: “We definitely feel very strongly that whoever the Democrat is, they ought to beat the hell out of George Bush. He is a disaster for this world and this country,” he said.

Err, um, Mr. Tyner: the dude ain't runnin'.

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

Wait = Hillary thought it was offensive to compare Osama Bin Laden and/or other modern terrorist "leaders" (like the leaders of Iran??) to Lenin and to Hitler?

I can understand it offending Hillary for her communist/socialist heroes to be compared to today's MUCH more evil terrorist leaders....um....

And I can understand it offending her for her Jihadist heroes to be compared to the ultra evil Lenin and Hitler since she does NOT believe them (esp Iran's little demon posessed leader) to be evil at all....

Either way - the evil in Hillary's heart and soul just can't be hidden forever....it is just seeping out....despite all her efforts to hide it.

Too bad most of the United States voters do not know what she said or could not figure out the implications if they did know....

[neverdem]

Thanks for the pic!

[potlatch]

You are very welcome!

[BerryDingle]

She’s completely comfortable and “at home” with either a Chairman Mao shirt with matching pants and “little red book” as she is with a pantsuit with swastika armband. Although, I have to admit, the Chairman Mao shirt has brought lots of Hsu windfall. Those dishwashers are just little darlings aren’t they?

[Candor7]

Great article which reveals the advice our President has been getting from strategists on the totalitarian threat of fascism, Islamofascism.

It is clear from his speech that the president is listening to the right people. Those who advise him follow the logic and analysis of Winston Churchill, and various post WWII historians struggled to put the rise of fascism around the world into a logical perspective:( it didn't just happen in Germany but it was an international movement, which appealed to groups in every nation around the world, including in the United States. Among the supporters of German Fascism were Charles Lindberg and then ambassador to Britain, Joseph Kennedy, both democrats. It was only in a group of five or six nations that the Fascists managed to gain power, and form the infamous Axis which brought about WWII: Germany, Italy,Spain, several Balkan States,and Japan.)

It is this view of history which now informs our president, and it is a view which has been handed down to us by men who spent years analyzing the causes of WWII and the fascist movement which was finally destroyed by Allied forces. It was destroyed in the US also, and men like Lindberg and Kennedy had to eat a large dose of crow dinner. So it will eventually be with our current crop of traitorous democrat fascisti supporters of the Sharia Law Imams who beat women to death, and cut off the arms and legs of criminals, and impale them on sharpened stakes through their rectums, for things such as uncorroborated adultery. The Democrats are on the wrong side of history, just as they were prior to WWII. And the Republican party has the Dems right where they want them , going into the 2008 electoral season.

I am heartened by this article and the president's speech. He is finally taking the true view of Islamic Fascism to the American people.( Would that it had been done in 2002 more stridently) It is a view which was not invented over night, but comes to us from those who lived and fought a similar foe, with similar tactics and ideology dedicated to the destruction of the free world.

It is no accident that Tony Blair also subscribes to this view of history, for British historians, including Winston Churchill, were leaders in its research, construction and dissemination.

No current Democrat candidate for the presidency can stand against the argument of this historical view on fascism. Only one democrat that I know of supports it, the honorable Democrat Senator from Connecticut, Lieberman.If the democrats are serious about winning the presidency, they would put him into the running. He would be their only hope. Thanks to the DNC, and the skillful work of the Republican party in the 2006 election in Connecticut, that will NOT happen.

This view of Islamofascism should be spread far and wide prior to November 2008, and used to destroy the left wing adherents to a Utopian dream ( like Neville Chamberlain's) that all nations must join hands and sing "Kum by hyah," all the way to the mosque, or die. The Nazis issued similar ultimatums on behalf of the Aryan races, and were halted by a band of young men over the English Channel in Hurricanes and Spitfires. So it must be in the Straights of Hormuz.

Islamofascism must be defeated completely and utterly, destroyed to the last little damning fascist Imam, or there will be no peace in the world except through a World Caliphate supported by totalitarian states such as China, Russia , and North Korea. President Bush has copped to the chase, and so should ALL of our Republican candidates. Certainly so has the King of Saudi Arabia, if one is to believe the latest recent news reports from the now Liberal Asylum of Insanity that is Great Britain.

This view is one reason why both Tony Blair and President Bush will be remembered in history as heroic, accurate figures,on this side of a war which is sure to come, with China and Russia in the mix as oil sucking proxies to the coming World Caliphate movement in Axis form.

The West must prevail, but first there will be a waking up process , which is just now beginning. And that wake up depends very much on the defeat of the Democrat traitorous political machine in 2008. If not, the blood of millions will wash the streams, lakes and rivers of Europe yet again. And then we will just watch this time, until we will have to fight a battle desperation, born of a direct missile threat on our own homes and neigborhoods on both the East and West coasts within 10 to 15 years.

Kudos to our president for his speech,and to Mark Hemmingway for a highly accurate report.

[PhilDragoo]

[potlatch]

You DO manage to find the ‘best’ pictures of her, lol. Red in the face, yellow teeth and blue eyeballs.

Where’s the green? In all the cash she has stashed!

[potlatch]

Very good writeup Candor!

[ripley]

heil hillary!!!

[ripley]

hillary!’s constituency of scu&bags.

[Caipirabob]

What CommieNazi Constituency?

[Freedom'sWorthIt]

LOL - yes they are - little darlings.... never knew that dishwashing was such a profitable career.....

[sageb1]

“Err, um, Mr. Tyner: the dude ain’t runnin’.”

Future history books will discuss BDS and its impact, but only if our side wins.