Believe what you want, but the only people who would vote for an anti-American terrorist appeaser are anti-Americans, and they are going to vote for the most anti-American candidate. If cut and run does not run, they will vote democrat.
Why would anti-war kooks and leftists support Paul anyway? One of the biggest tenets of the anti-war left is global socialism. They oppose the war in Iraq but have no problem with our troops being used for humanitarian missions and crap. Paul opposes all of this garbage, that and the envirowackoism. Now YOU can believe what you want, but them's the facts.
I know a dozen or so RP supporters personally. Almost all are white collar professionals who formerly voted Republican. I’ve also seen a number of former freepers on other sites who support RP. They seem to be motivated in about equal measure by RP’s position on the war and limited govt. It’s true you also see a lot of libertarian leaning liberals supporting him as well (see digg.com for example), but it’s a mistake to think they are his only supporters.
Because FR officially supports the war, and most posters here are fervently in favor of continuing the war, it’s easy to believe that there is universal support among R’s for the war. From what I see, that is not the case, and just about everyone I know would be considered conservative. There is substantial dissent, and even more who are on the fence. Simply dismissing anyone who opposes the war as anti-American is not a winning strategy.
If the race comes down to Hillary vs. Rudy vs. Paul, I'll happily vote for the person I agree with on issues such ass life, the 2nd Amendment and small government. Sorry if that makes me "anti-American".