Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rideharddiefast
The anti-war organizations are supporting Obama and Hillary, not Paul. What you have is a handful of anti-war whackos who are not fully aware of Paul's views & are exploiting his campaign. But Paul's not anti-war nor is he a pacifist. He has always supported a strong national defense & our military.

Why would anti-war kooks and leftists support Paul anyway? One of the biggest tenets of the anti-war left is global socialism. They oppose the war in Iraq but have no problem with our troops being used for humanitarian missions and crap. Paul opposes all of this garbage, that and the envirowackoism. Now YOU can believe what you want, but them's the facts.

38 posted on 11/03/2007 2:36:02 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GOOGLE FRED THOMPSON! (404 Page Error Found - This page cannot be displayed))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; rideharddiefast

“Paul’s not anti-war nor is he a pacifist. He has always supported a strong national defense & our military.” EEE

Depends on how you define ‘strong national defense’. The problem is that Ron Paul is on record stating that ‘a few submarines’ can adequately defend the United States. He can hardly be counted as a supporter of a strong national defense.


89 posted on 11/10/2007 2:09:09 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul isn't mentioned in the Constitution either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson