LA Times Sitting on Explosive Prez Candidate Story?

bigheaddc ^ | 10/31/07 | BHDC Staff

[msnpatriot]

A major sex scandal story involving one of the leading presidential candidates is believed to be soon published by the LA Times, Big Head DC has learned. Details are slowly trickling in through people who’ve heard about the story, and with Larry Flynt saying he’s set to reveal a “huge” sex scandal story involving a sitting senator in the coming days, the rumors seem to be gathering traction.

“So I was down in DC this past weekend and happened to run into a well-connected media person, who told me flatly, unequivocally that ‘everyone knows’ the LA Times was sitting on a story, all wrapped up and ready to go about what is a potentially devastating sexual scandal involving a leading presidential candidate,” reports Pajamas Media’s Ron Rosenbaum. “‘Everyone knows’ meaning everyone in the DC mainstream media political reporting world. ‘Sitting on it’ because the paper couldn’t decide the complex ethics of whether and when to run it. The way I heard it they’d had it for a while but don’t know what to do. The person who told me is not an LAT person and knows I write and didn’t say ‘don’t write about this.’”

Several commenters on Rosenbaum’s article strongly believe that Hillary Clinton will ultimately be revealed as a lesbian, and that the recent GQ story her campaign helped kill by threatening to withhold a Bill Clinton interview may have gone into some shocking details into her sex life.Rumors of a close Hillary relationship with one of her top aides Huma Abedin, shown above, have long been swirling. Hillary has long denied being a lesbian.

[GOP Poet]

I was wondering when the love tales of Cindy Sheehan and Hilary would come out. Of course I am having a difficult time trying to fiqure out which one is the feminine partner. lol.

[freekitty]

It’s always everybody knows; that is except the public who should know. Of course, if we had known that Booba was a rapist; he would never have been elected President.

[null and void]

Can’t anyone read?

What? And ruin a perfectly good thread full of baseless speculation?

[fr_freak]

I wonder what position Huma would have in a Clinton White House - Top or Bottom?

I think a better question would be: will she be the "6" or the "9"?

[Graybeard58]

Is Hillary’s having sex with a woman any worse than Flynt’s having sex with a chicken?

Just musing here. If I had to choose between Hillary and a chicken, I would ask to see a picture of the chicken.

[advertising guy]

it is one of the tools of the Devil’s advocates you mean

when you murder, you are not of God.....

remember when Dean was the front runner ?

it was Guns - God & Gays

now all that is full circle in our face thanks to

this POS we have to hear, see and vote dead

[null and void]

How ugly would the chicken have to be?

[popdonnelly]

“You are such a cynic!”

Thank you. ;)

[CheyennePress]

Why would you call Rudy a pervert? Yeah, the circumstances in which he left one of his wives were pretty slimey, but that’s the worst I’ve seen about him.

[Free Vulcan]

So who’s Huma a beddin’?

[PreciousLiberty]

“Fred is a former senator.”

From everything I know about Fred so far, including having a _smokin’ hot_ young wife, I’m pretty darned sure it isn’t him... ;-)

[matthew fuller]

"Kucinich IS a space alien! "

But he prolly ain't gay!

[Sue Perkick]

LOL ;)

[keepitreal]

Seems Obama's primary opponent, Brad Hull, was also picked off in a scandal. It was learned that one of Obama's people pushed the story: Axelrod is known for operating in this gray area, part idealist, part hired muscle. It is difficult to discuss Axelrod in certain circles in Chicago without the matter of the Blair Hull divorce papers coming up. As the 2004 Senate primary neared, it was clear that it was a contest between two people: the millionaire liberal, Hull, who was leading in the polls, and Obama, who had built an impressive grass-roots campaign. About a month before the vote, The Chicago Tribune revealed, near the bottom of a long profile of Hull, that during a divorce proceeding, Hull’s second wife filed for an order of protection. In the following few days, the matter erupted into a full-fledged scandal that ended up destroying the Hull campaign and handing Obama an easy primary victory. The Tribune reporter who wrote the original piece later acknowledged in print that the Obama camp had “worked aggressively behind the scenes” to push the story. But there are those in Chicago who believe that Axelrod had an even more significant role — that he leaked the initial story. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/magazine/01axelrod.t.html?_r=3&oref=slogin&ref=magazine&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin&oref=slogin Let's see Obama's primary opponent picked off with a scandal, his general election opponent (Jack Ryan) picked off with a scandal and the boy wonder becomes a US Senator. Could history be repeating itself?

[JimSEA]

McCain

Larry Flint wouldn't do a hit piece on a liberal.

[tear gas]

Why would you call Rudy a pervert?

Proof:

http://romancatholicblog.typepad.com/roman_catholic_blog/2007/10/rudy-in-1996-im.html

More proof:

http://www.allreaders.com/rudy_giuliani.asp?autonumber=5

[Eagles6]

These are rumors from POWs that I believe were posted here on FR. I did not make them up. I have absolutely no idea whether they are true or not but I guarantee that since they are out there the dems will use them if McCain is the nominee. I also have no doubt that they will use the fact that he made propaganda broadcasts for the enemy (as many did after torture). I know that any of these broadcasts were made under incredible duress and won't give them any credibility.

I am concerned about the rumors of adultery with subordinates. My major beef with McCain is pandering to illegals and McCain Fiengold.

[MHGinTN]

Obama would be harder to defeat than the huge-negatives carrying Rodham-rodent.

[seekthetruth]

“Larry Flint wouldn’t do a hit piece on a liberal.”

Unless it was to help Hillary. My guess the story involves Obama. Just my guess.

[cradle of freedom]

If you remember back in the nineties, the Clintons got a lot of criticism for keep 900 FBI files for months. These FBI files had raw data which the FBI routinely collect on people in government. A short time after this was revealed, Larry Flint made an offer of a $1,000,000 to anyone who had a sexual encounter with a Republican, he specifically singled out Republicans. Then his magazine outed several Republican legislators who had had affairs. This was a deliberate political act and I believe that the million dollar offer by Flynt was just a ruse to cover the source of the accusations - the 900 FBI files which I believe was passed on to Flynt by the Clintons.

Fast forward to today — the Washington Madame claims that she has 10,000 names in her little black book including some people in government. But who does she name? only one -Vitter a Republican. Then came the Republican Senator caught with a page and then Larry Craig. Previous to that it was the Republican lobbying money scandals. Can it be that the Democrats are all pure as the driven snow that they do not have any scandal themselves? Or could it be that hiring detectives to dig up dirt on Republicans is the Democrats new campaign strategy.

Republican candidates must be really careful and if necessary hire some private detectives of their own.

What was the name of that detective that was linked to the Clintons - was it Pellegrino?