[Anti-Bubba182]

Chuckie is vermin, but politically astute. Nevertheless, Bush will not allow a Nuclear Iran while he is President and is likely to strike.

[vetsvette]

And, not confronting Iran will result in the destruction of Western society.

Your point Chuckie?

[Norman Bates]

Only a great fool would lick his chops because of political advantage over national concerns. Schumer is sick.

[Chode]

it's spelled SCHWULER!!!

(Schwuler = Fag in German)

[Wings-n-Wind]

Chuck-for-brains.....

[taildragger]

G_D forbid that we cut off the head of the Snake and make America look victorious

G_D forbid, we show what pusillanimous pile of effluent the Carter Presidency was in starting this whole mess.

My fear is the likes of Chuck mau push Israel into action, rather than the U.S. doing what must be done and launch the B-2's, to prevent another Hitler.

Is it me, but when it comes to Chuck, is it mendacity I smell?

[Gritty]

For Schmucky The Putzhead, it’s never about what’s good for America, but instead it’s about what’s good for his slimey Party and his own creepy political fortunes...

[NRA2BFree]

Bombing Iran, says Chuck Schumer, would be a big political loser for Republican candidates in 2008.

If Chucky is against it, then we ought to do it. He's afraid it will do just the opposite of what he says here. The US would pull together and that's what the RATS are afraid of. That would be a sure sign the GOP would not only win the Presidency but would recapture the House and the Senate!

[rod1]

Well if it would totally destroy the GOP, then Chuckie should be all for it even pushing the GOP toward war it (war with Iran).

Come on Chuckie...where is your party loyalty?

or maybe it is really his greatest fear because the RATS as the REid-Pelosi-themed let’s-lose-a war-party could not be trusted.

[Dark Wing]

FYI

[RightWhale]

He said this a while ago, but he says a lot of things almost every day.

[johnthebaptistmoore]

And why should Chuck even care about what happens to the GOP?

[Mr. Mojo]

“It would change the landscape against [the GOP], big time,” Mr. Schumer said

Nope Chuckie, only a long, drawn-out, nation-building effort with lots of U.S. casualties would do that. But fortuntely that isn't in the cards for Iran. It'll be quick and successuful, and if anything will help the GOP immensely.

But then again you already know that.

[Tarpon]

Well then, this brings up a simple question doesn’t it — Why would you warn your adversary of impending destruction? Wouldn’t you just keep quite and watch?

Of course, if Iran had a nuclear bomb, they would likely try and use it on Israel or maybe in New York City. I wonder why he isn’t concerned about that? Jews live in both places last time I checked.

[Recovering_Democrat]

Bombing Iran, says Chuck Schumer, would be a big political loser for Republican candidates in 2008.

Any THINKING person will see that Chuck Schumer, schmuck extraordinaire, treats the nation's security as a political issue and not as a reason to be vigilante against our enemies.

Seeing such important things primarily through political eyes is the hallmark of a hack. And Schumer certainly is a hack.

[popdonnelly]

Okay, Chuckie, what’s your solution? Let the Israelis do it?

[Radix]

More importantly would a war against Iran destroy Iran?

Chuckie is aware of the real ramifications, and the last thing that he wants to see is a republican President kicking ass and putting the Iranian chumps away once and for all.

Something that democrats simply do not have the will, or the sac to even attempt.

[jrooney]

Zogby of all people, liberal pollster which will do anything to assist the donks, just published a poll saying 52% of the public was okay with striking Iran. We will strike them from the air with our new 30,000 bombs wiping out or setting back their nuke program severely. We will also hit the republican guard and quds forces because they have now been declared terrorist organizations. Air bombardment like the world has never seen. The 70% student population will then be able to overthrow the mullahs because the republican guards and quds forces will be removed from the equation. Few ground troops, special ops only, will be needed. There will be no ground invasion and the war will not last very long.

[kinghorse]

I don’t know. Most likely scenario would be US strikes against the military or nuclear installations, avoiding civilians as much as possible. Iran responds by hitting US military/diplomatic targets in Iraq. US responds by destroying Iranian missile capability and continues to degrade infrastructure. Political pressure in US after 5 days would be intense. Then the Iranian/muslim collaborator or agent hits a soft civilian target in the USA. History starts new and quislings protest at their own personal risk.

[G8 Diplomat]

And no Iran war would destroy Israel. If we do not get them, they will get us (and others) first.

[DGHoodini]

Wishful thinking by Sniveling Schuster the Craven Shyster.