Posted on 10/31/2007 11:44:31 AM PDT by kregger1
So I was down in DC this past weekend and happened to run into a well-connected media person, who told me flatly, unequivocally that “everyone knows” The LA Times was sitting on a story, all wrapped up and ready to go about what is a potentially devastating sexual scandal involving a leading Presidential candidate. “Everyone knows” meaning everyone in the DC mainstream media political reporting world. “Sitting on it” because the paper couldn’t decide the complex ethics of whether and when to run it. The way I heard it they’d had it for a while but don’t know what to do. The person who told me )not an LAT person) knows I write and didn’t say “don’t write about this”.
(Excerpt) Read more at pajamasmedia.com ...
No, but elite liberals always play their base for fools.
Lot's of Latinos and blacks are fairly conservative - same with Union households. No point in giving the finger to useful idiots...
Then there's ME money slouching around - and a Muslim female lover might go down badly... if that rumor is true - and I have doubts...
Nah, the mass of people who prop up the 2% of dems who really are liberal elites would not be thrilled ... the MSM will do what it can to protect her. Under the guise of "ethics" or whatever. Ethics that would be flushed if the story was about a Republican.
O’Bama and Oprah?
I really dont think the RAT party wants Hillary because with her negatives at 50% they don’t think she could win.
The problem for the RATS throwing her under the bus now is because they don’t think Edwards could beat Obama and they know for a fact that their racist party wont elect a black.
Unless they can get Owl Gore to run they are stuck with trying to hide this story.
IMHO that is the only thing keeping this from being reported in the MSM.
Why? Because they probably got it from someone either in... or sympathetic to her campaign.
The original article specifically states it’s not Edwards.
* live-in Aide Huma, not Muma
Gotta be John Edwards. Already rumors around about him.
“The people have a right to know...exactly what we WANT them to know.”
None of the above, its Queen Hillary.
Janet Reno?
I’ve heard rumors of coke parties and osama obama.
LLS
They must mean Democrat or they wouldn’t sit on the story.
This guy needs to run spell check from time to time. He might be taken a bit more seriously next time around.
For the record, this isn’t about Fred Thompson. This is about a Washington, D.C. insider.
Isn’t the MSM lever? To prevent another bill/monica story from surfacing, they throw this at us.
Indeterminacy problem
Given an infinite number of possible theories,
And given a finite amount of experimental evidence,
It is impossible to disambiguate between all viable theories.
The logic here is simple; with an infinite number of theories, it is always possible to take one viable theory which is supported by evidence, and change it to add some complexity, and the result is yet another perfectly viable theory. Often it is even possible to invoke totally different forces with the same result.
For example, it could be that the Earth revolves around the sun due to the effects of inertia and gravity, or it could be simply that the Earth enjoys revolving around the sun and so chooses to do so. Experimentally these two theories cannot be differentiated.
So you think it’s Hillary? I sure hope so, we can start photoshopping her with hair in her teeth.
DO THOSE TEETH HAVE LEAD IN THE PAINT??? HMMMMMMMMMMM???
bumps in the night
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.