“[What probability do you think is it that a 1st grader wrote the letters?]
I’d say the probability is about 95%.
You may truly believe otherwise, but your beliefs do not change what the facts say. And the facts are pretty clear.”
Ed, I don’t “truly believe” anything on the issue. If I thought the theory was plausible, I would submit it to a former CIA or FBI or police handwriting analysis for expert opinion, give them 5 handwriting samples of the writing, and ask their opinion. (In the real world, I would seek to give them originals) You failed to do that or at least failed to find any handwriting expert who agreed with you — and only have to agree with you the web poster you stole the idea from 6 years ago.
While there may be many hundreds of million of people who think US-based operatives of Al Qaeda are responsible for the anthrax mailings, there aren’t two people on the planet that I know of who think a 1st grader wrote the letters. And attributing a 95% probability to it and deeming it a FACT, rather than a theory, well, that’s stupid. Really stupid.
Your expertise in posting celebrity pornography pictures — “I know it when I see it” and your keen insight that celebrities rarely pose for twat pictures — does not suddenly make you have a clue on true crime or intelligence analysis. Your 400 “case files” of celebrity pornography simply do not provide relevant experience, just a prior example of massive federal copyright infringement.
The only way you provide worthwhile content is by engaging in massive intentional copyright infringement both on your pornography page and on your Amerithrax page where you have archived many hundreds of articles without paying for a news stream as all those news organizations require. You have no respect for federal law, Ed. You are one of the single greatest violator of federal copyrights on the web today.
Ed, for example, why do you persist in keeping the nude photographs with Sofia Loren’s head on the body when you know she objects? You are like the pickpocket at the grocery store who keeps doing it until the store owner speaks to him. But the result is that your infringement is intentional and thus warrants punitive damages. Rather than concocting really stupid theories, why don’t you comply with the federal law?
While the theory a 1st grader wrote the letters may be stupid, because the writer of a short letter would have no reason to involve a young child who then might tell someone (like his mom), the theory you are an intentional copyright violator is rock solid and subject to the available documentary evidence.
On your website, you explain:
FROM WWW.MSNBC.COM:
Sept. 21 — Sophia Loren doesn’t want her good name — or her even better body — being exploited on the Internet. The actress, citing “distress, depression, shame, humiliation, embarrassment and shock,” has slapped 76 Internet companies with a lawsuit, alleging that they’re using her name to lure Web surfers to pornographic sites.
“THE DEFENDANTS ... have purported to display nude or semi-nude pictures of Sophia Loren, and some Defendants … have displayed photographs featuring Ms. Loren’s image without permission from Ms. Loren,” according to the suit, filed in a U.S. district court in Indiana.
The actress, who turned 65 on Monday, is asking for a jury trial. Her lawsuit did not specify damage, but asked for — among other things — “damages and motion for permanent injunction.”
...
Loren issued a statement from her home in Geneva: “I am horrified by the disgusting actions of the offending companies.”
Investigative Programs: Cyber Investigations
Sofia Loren is not obligated to put this warning on copyrighted images to make it true.
“Warning: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to 5 years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.”
Ed, rather than call in to the FBI with your stupid 1st Grader wrote the anthrax letters theory, (”it’s a FACT!” “95% certain,etc.”), why don’t you comply with the stern warning they so nicely put on their website about copyright infringement. Your infringement is continuing and intentional.