Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZacandPook

http://www.fbi.gov/ipr/

Investigative Programs: Cyber Investigations

Sofia Loren is not obligated to put this warning on copyrighted images to make it true.

“Warning: The unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this copyrighted work is illegal. Criminal copyright infringement, including infringement without monetary gain, is investigated by the FBI and is punishable by up to 5 years in federal prison and a fine of $250,000.”

Ed, rather than call in to the FBI with your stupid 1st Grader wrote the anthrax letters theory, (”it’s a FACT!” “95% certain,etc.”), why don’t you comply with the stern warning they so nicely put on their website about copyright infringement. Your infringement is continuing and intentional.


59 posted on 11/01/2007 3:32:51 AM PDT by ZacandPook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: ZacandPook; Ernest_at_the_Beach

Here is Judy addressing the anthrax mailings in September 2007.
2:05, especially beginning
2:41
She says FBI’s “working theory is that American with defense or military experience”

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1099560634834568617&q=%22Judith+Miller%22&total=83&start=10&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=2

For the American with defense or military experience that was subject of FBI’s theory, see Washington Post September 2006 article quoted in the article linked by Ernest and the discussion of Ali Al-Timimi who had a high security clearance for work with the Navy and had access to the facilitites funded by DARPA (to the tune of $13 million in 2001 and adjacent years).


60 posted on 11/01/2007 6:57:20 AM PDT by ZacandPook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: ZacandPook

I asked those questions of Mr. Lake months ago......why does he not provide academic citations to his articles, even though he publishes the articles in full? I was told to mind my own business, because Mr. Lake is such a god for saving and archiving all of his sources so that we, the public, can forever continue our research. My comment was if he is to be considered a viable source of data and facts, then he would provide proper references. Until then, his theories are questionable and food for the round file.

And the 95% fact that a 1st-grader wrote those words? What do you base that on...that 95% of your brain was working the day you devised that theory?

I think Zac hit the nail on the head this time.....looking at porn only makes you an expert on anatomy.


61 posted on 11/01/2007 9:49:17 AM PDT by Badabing Badablonde (New to the internet? CLICK HERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson